Vincent van Glock

Vincent van Glock — CS2 Stats

US76561198013809473[U:1:53543745]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,299Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,446Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVincent van GlockFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning56
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37549Last 10037%Win rateTWLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression6.9
Utility6.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time624ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–6
131Biggest win — dust2
3Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 47% over 19dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB1991047%0.02
nukeD1651131%0.03
vertigoC167944%0.05
infernoC156940%0.03
anubisD103730%0.03
trainD62433%0.06
dust2D51420%-0.01
mirage4040%-0.02
italy31233%0.01
overpass21150%0.11
office110100%0.05
fachwerk1010%0.05
ancient1010%-0.03
poseidon110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

224,473Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
19,106Matches
73.6%Match win rate · Top 1% of tracked players
52.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
20,162MVPs
3,448Hours (in match)
7,895Bombs planted
2,713Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4784,234
AWP27,689
P2504,577
Tec-93,127

Lifetime map wins

14,575nuke
11,398dust2
10,302inferno
2,851vertigo
2,143train
1,137office
635cbble
352italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

84Matches
57%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
632msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
12.38HE damage / grenade
7.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2572% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–12-0.0225%22 Aug
office13–40.0540%22 Aug
italy10–13-0.0337%22 Aug
train13–80.1322%22 Aug
nuke13–100.0427%22 Aug
fachwerk11–130.0518%22 Aug
cache13–70.1420%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.0221%1 Aug
cache13–90.0423%15 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0119%30 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0224%29 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0013%20 Jun
cache13–8-0.0213%20 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0317%17 Jun
nuke13–70.0313%17 Jun
cache12–12-0.0118%6 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0329%6 Jun
dust28–130.0234%6 Jun
vertigo2–13-0.0426%6 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0030%6 Jun
inferno13–100.0319%30 May
cache4–130.0032%30 May
nuke12–16-0.0314%18 May
inferno1–13-0.0121%18 May
nuke13–70.1025%17 May
cache10–13-0.0621%17 May
inferno13–30.0416%8 May
cache13–30.0337%7 May
anubis4–13-0.0022%6 May
vertigo6–13-0.0423%6 May
cache2–13-0.0338%6 May
cache5–13-0.1016%5 May
cache10–13-0.0318%30 Apr
vertigo13–60.1021%30 Apr
cache13–60.1427%30 Apr
cache13–80.0725%29 Apr
cache7–130.0223%29 Apr
cache13–110.0622%29 Apr
cache9–130.0226%29 Apr
cache13–70.0320%29 Apr
cache3–13-0.0344%29 Apr
cache13–20.1629%29 Apr
cache3–130.0257%29 Apr
dust22–13-0.0614%24 Apr
anubis8–130.0526%24 Apr
train2–13-0.0132%22 Apr
anubis5–130.0415%22 Apr
inferno13–40.100%22 Apr
vertigo13–110.1118%22 Apr
anubis13–80.0227%21 Apr
inferno12–120.0013%21 Apr
nuke13–110.0727%21 Apr
dust210–13-0.0311%16 Apr
mirage5–13-0.069%16 Apr
nuke6–130.036%16 Apr
vertigo10–130.0121%16 Apr
vertigo13–80.0421%15 Apr
train2–130.0933%15 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0527%14 Apr
italy10–130.0232%14 Apr
vertigo10–130.0525%13 Apr
train7–13-0.0118%13 Apr
nuke12–120.0023%13 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0018%13 Apr
vertigo12–120.0626%13 Apr
inferno3–130.0521%13 Apr
italy13–90.0213%12 Apr
vertigo13–70.0226%10 Apr
nuke8–130.0729%10 Apr
overpass13–80.1517%10 Apr
anubis13–90.0311%9 Apr
dust213–10.0414%9 Apr
inferno8–130.0427%9 Apr
vertigo11–13-0.018%9 Apr
nuke8–130.0419%9 Apr
vertigo13–80.0520%8 Apr
mirage8–130.0624%8 Apr
nuke6–130.0116%8 Apr
inferno8–130.0436%8 Apr
nuke12–120.1122%5 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0123%3 Apr
vertigo12–120.0721%3 Apr
anubis13–80.0531%3 Apr
train3–130.1327%3 Apr
inferno13–60.1827%2 Apr
vertigo9–130.0720%2 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0425%2 Apr
nuke8–130.0625%2 Apr
overpass3–130.0724%2 Apr
vertigo13–40.0529%1 Apr
train13–100.0110%28 Mar
inferno12–12-0.0910%28 Mar
nuke12–120.0327%25 Mar
anubis7–130.1145%25 Mar
vertigo6–130.0914%25 Mar
nuke13–80.0427%25 Mar
vertigo13–50.1311%24 Mar
inferno11–130.0920%23 Mar
anubis6–130.058%23 Mar
poseidon9–70.0228%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →