WhoRänZone — CS2 Stats

76561198013015354[U:1:52749626]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,946Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,973Hours in CS61Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating3.6 Learning

Premier CS Rating4,898Grey band · top ~79.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#42881 of 55936 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	42.8%	42.7%	44.0%	1.2% short
Shot accuracy	13.0%	10.8%	11.6%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.13	1.00	1.03	above
Match win rate	41.8%	44.1%	45.1%	3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning46

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLLLWLLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6

Aggression3.7

Utility6.0

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning4.6

Utility6.0

Mechanics3.9

Opening Duels0.2

Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time605ms−74ms

first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms

Headshot accuracy12.1%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–4

13–1Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

L3Current streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 17% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	37	17–20	46%	-0.00
cache	C	19	7–12	37%	-0.00
nuke	D	12	2–10	17%	0.01
anubis	S	8	6–2	75%	0.04
ancient	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
mirage	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
inferno	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.03
train	—	3	2–1	67%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,171Lifetime kills

1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players

5,324Matches

41.8%Match win rate

42.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players

13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players

6,745MVPs

1,696Hours (in match)

5,502Bombs planted

698Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,877

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,808

Galil AR3,986

FAMAS3,900

AWP3,489

P2000 / USP-S3,382

Five-SeveN2,526

Desert Eagle2,511

Glock-182,403

P901,808

Lifetime map wins

9,993dust2

4,609inferno

2,971nuke

1,108train

1,049vertigo

987cbble

361office

195lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches

46%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

70.6ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	20	65%	0.97	12.7
Ancient	6	17%	0.85	13.3
Anubis	6	33%	1.18	14.2
Nuke	6	33%	0.82	12.7
Cache	5	40%	1.05	16.4
Mirage	5	20%	0.77	12.8
Overpass	1	100%	1.71	12.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.76	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy

30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.5%Spray accuracy

67.4%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

611msReaction time

26.2%T opening success

31.9%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

6.28HE damage / grenade

16.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.8616% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4763 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.2445% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	10–13	0.04	21%	30 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.05	19%	30 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	9%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	9%	29 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	13%	29 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	15%	29 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	14%	28 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	14%	28 Aug →
dust2	10–1	0.03	16%	28 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	5%	28 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	7%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.00	12%	27 Aug →
anubis	3–13	0.02	7%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	13%	27 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.08	11%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	9%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	10%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.00	19%	24 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	19%	23 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	12%	23 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	6%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	7%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	9%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.05	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	10%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	10%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	16%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	8%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	-0.02	13%	23 Aug →
train	9–13	-0.05	10%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.09	18%	22 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	11%	22 Aug →
cache	8–1	0.10	7%	22 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.02	7%	22 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.01	7%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.03	21%	22 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	11%	22 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.05	10%	22 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	10%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	8%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.12	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	16%	22 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	10%	21 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	10%	21 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	8%	21 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.10	6%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	26%	21 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	11%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.05	7%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	18%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.07	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.03	18%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	13%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	22%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	17%	17 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	11%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	17%	16 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.03	18%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	8%	16 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.09	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	5%	14 Aug →
shelter	11–13	0.03	10%	13 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	12%	13 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	13%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	11%	13 Aug →
train	8–3	0.00	9%	12 Aug →
train	13–5	0.07	10%	12 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	12%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	15%	11 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	6%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	9%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.03	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.08	3%	10 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	18%	10 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	11%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.02	9%	10 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.05	8%	9 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.01	16%	9 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.07	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	16%	9 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.06	19%	9 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.04	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.00	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	13%	9 Aug →
overpass	8–13	0.02	16%	9 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	13%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	16%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	6%	9 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.02	15%	9 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	17%	9 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.03	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.00	11%	9 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	21%	9 Aug →