Battleshrimp — CS2 Stats

76561197999363164[U:1:39097436]✓ No bans

999Tracked matches31%Win rate2022Tracked since

802Hours in CS

CSDB Rating3.9 Learning

Premier CS Rating13,647Blue band · top ~35.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20736 of 31346 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	44.6%	42.5%	44.2%	meets
Shot accuracy	9.2%	10.9%	11.2%	2.0% short
Kill/death ratio	0.92	0.99	1.04	0.11 short
Match win rate	43.3%	44.2%	45.3%	2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51

Positioning52

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1

Aggression8.0

Utility4.0

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1

Positioning5.2

Utility4.0

Mechanics3.8

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time624ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms

Headshot accuracy20.3%−1.8%

first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–0Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

1–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 9nukeWeakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	25	12–13	48%	0.01
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	0.00
nuke	D	16	5–11	31%	-0.01
inferno	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.03
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.01
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.04
cache	—	4	3–1	75%	0.05
office	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.02
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,656Lifetime kills

0.92K/D

1,772Matches

43.3%Match win rate

44.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players

9.2%Shot accuracy

3,648MVPs

802Hours (in match)

1,021Bombs planted

384Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,449

AWP5,495

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,272

Desert Eagle2,674

P2000 / USP-S2,039

Glock-181,169

SSG 081,117

AUG804

P250765

Galil AR678

Lifetime map wins

3,508dust2

2,576inferno

2,345nuke

370train

309vertigo

242office

102cbble

24italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

35Matches

57%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

85.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	12	75%	1.21	18.4
Mirage	9	44%	0.89	13.6
Nuke	4	75%	1.19	17.3
Inferno	3	0%	0.88	15.0
Anubis	3	67%	1.68	21.0
Cache	2	50%	1.11	14.5
Ancient	2	50%	0.70	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy

30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.9%Spray accuracy

67.2%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

613msReaction time

37.0%T opening success

53.9%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

6.87HE damage / grenade

13.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4111 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.9779% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	14–16	-0.08	16%	7 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	22%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	29%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	9%	7 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	25%	3 Aug →
nuke	8–2	0.07	25%	3 Aug →
boulder	3–13	-0.02	20%	3 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.02	24%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	16%	30 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.10	14%	30 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	20%	30 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.03	30%	29 Jul →
office	10–13	-0.04	21%	29 Jul →
office	12–12	-0.00	30%	29 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	21%	29 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	19%	25 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	31%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	24%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	13%	23 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	17%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	10%	23 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	16%	23 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	24%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.01	18%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.16	29%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.07	17%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	10%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.04	26%	22 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	17%	22 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.16	28%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.10	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	17%	21 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	12%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.08	18%	21 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.02	15%	20 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	9%	20 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	23%	20 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	16%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.07	26%	20 Jul →
overpass	10–13	-0.06	19%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.06	32%	20 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.01	33%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.05	27%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.00	36%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	18%	19 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	6%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	31%	19 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.03	23%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.05	31%	15 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	23%	15 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	25%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.07	18%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	27%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	21%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.01	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	12%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	26%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.08	27%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	33%	14 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.05	20%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	17%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	31%	7 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.04	31%	7 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	24%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.08	17%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.06	25%	6 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.10	21%	6 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	17%	5 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.05	22%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.05	16%	4 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	29%	3 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	24%	2 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	23%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	18%	2 Jul →
overpass	13–3	0.15	25%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	14%	30 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	16%	30 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	11%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.00	20%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–0	-0.03	23%	27 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.04	17%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–0	-0.01	17%	27 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	31%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.08	24%	26 Jun →
inferno	16–12	0.06	24%	26 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	22%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	24%	26 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	27%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	44%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.05	22%	25 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.05	28%	25 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	17%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.05	26%	25 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	19%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–16	-0.01	23%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.04	19%	22 Jun →