cPt. h0llyw00d

cPt. h0llyw00d — CS2 Stats

NO76561197998242071[U:1:37976343]Steam profile ↗

620Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,161Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcPt. h0llyw00dFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning42
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression5.8
Utility4.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.2
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time631ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy27.7%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 10–13
131Biggest win — overpass
11Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 10mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB26141254%0.01
anubisB179853%-0.01
ancientA1710759%-0.01
mirageD1431121%-0.02
dust2C125742%-0.00
overpassA106460%-0.01
nuke2020%0.03
cache2020%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,231Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,406Matches
45.2%Match win rate
44.7%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
4,848MVPs
1,161Hours (in match)
3,235Bombs planted
501Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,802inferno
4,465dust2
3,710cbble
519nuke
449train
128vertigo
101office
62lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

125Matches
53%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
67.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2673%1.2114.7
Anubis2152%1.0512.8
Dust21856%1.1212.3
Mirage128%0.7011.8
Inferno922%0.7813.3
Vertigo250%0.497.0
Train10%0.6210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.7%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
636msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
14.32HE damage / grenade
3.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4752 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0628% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0347%23 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0320%10 Jun
inferno11–130.0246%10 Jun
overpass13–60.0133%7 Jun
mirage9–130.0226%6 Jun
overpass13–10.0625%6 Jun
anubis13–80.0327%6 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0021%3 Jun
inferno13–60.0937%2 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0225%1 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0312%31 May
nuke10–13-0.0814%31 May
ancient13–16-0.0020%28 May
anubis16–130.0026%20 May
inferno8–13-0.0425%20 May
inferno13–16-0.0234%18 May
ancient13–4-0.0417%18 May
anubis9–13-0.0427%17 May
ancient13–11-0.0339%17 May
mirage8–130.0130%17 May
overpass13–4-0.0520%17 May
dust27–130.0141%13 May
ancient13–16-0.1015%13 May
inferno13–20.0219%10 May
inferno8–13-0.0820%9 May
dust27–13-0.0124%9 May
cache8–13-0.0419%9 May
inferno9–13-0.0543%5 May
ancient16–130.0139%5 May
mirage7–13-0.0329%5 May
cache3–13-0.0629%4 May
anubis10–13-0.0527%3 May
inferno13–10-0.0335%3 May
anubis13–11-0.0030%3 May
inferno14–160.0529%2 May
ancient16–13-0.0733%2 May
dust211–13-0.0427%1 May
mirage13–110.0224%1 May
inferno13–110.0424%1 May
anubis13–100.0132%1 May
anubis14–16-0.0627%30 Apr
inferno13–1-0.0317%30 Apr
anubis8–130.0119%29 Apr
ancient13–50.0728%29 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0526%26 Apr
anubis13–60.0230%26 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0725%25 Apr
dust22–13-0.0832%25 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0825%25 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0516%25 Apr
mirage13–70.0313%24 Apr
dust29–13-0.0813%24 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0523%24 Apr
anubis11–130.0019%23 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0626%21 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0127%21 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0628%21 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0221%19 Apr
mirage11–130.0023%19 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0419%18 Apr
dust24–13-0.1229%18 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0317%18 Apr
inferno13–70.0333%18 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0430%18 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0119%17 Apr
anubis13–2-0.0323%17 Apr
overpass13–60.0333%17 Apr
dust213–80.0219%17 Apr
inferno13–90.0233%16 Apr
inferno10–130.0244%15 Apr
ancient13–100.0122%15 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0521%13 Apr
overpass8–130.0231%12 Apr
ancient10–130.0421%12 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0416%11 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0333%9 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0634%9 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0128%5 Apr
ancient13–90.0021%4 Apr
overpass13–60.0317%4 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0519%4 Apr
anubis13–110.0417%4 Apr
inferno13–40.0839%2 Apr
inferno13–110.0317%2 Apr
inferno8–10.108%2 Apr
dust213–100.0314%30 Mar
ancient13–90.0836%30 Mar
inferno13–40.1025%30 Mar
dust213–50.1319%27 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0428%27 Mar
dust213–110.1117%25 Mar
dust213–50.0230%21 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0311%21 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0131%21 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0121%18 Mar
ancient4–130.0128%15 Mar
inferno13–110.0618%15 Mar
nuke10–130.1533%15 Mar
dust210–13-0.0330%13 Mar
inferno6–130.0222%13 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →