wheresyourface — CS2 Stats

US76561197997994270[U:1:37728542]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,527Tracked matches32%Win rate2023Tracked since

652Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,351Purple band · top ~15.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10904 of 21048 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning62

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–45–9Last 10046%Win rateWTWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression7.8

Utility5.7

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.2

Utility5.7

Mechanics9.3

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time577ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms

Headshot accuracy15.8%−2.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — eldorado 9–4

13–2Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	28	15–13	54%	0.06
nuke	B	27	13–14	48%	0.05
mirage	D	12	4–8	33%	0.04
vertigo	C	9	4–5	44%	0.06
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	0.05
inferno	D	5	1–4	20%	0.03
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	0.05
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.10
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.31
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,401Lifetime kills

1.52K/D · Top 5% of tracked players

2,280Matches

48.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players

51.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players

0.1%Shot accuracy

8,619MVPs

652Hours (in match)

1,686Bombs planted

590Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,592

M4A4 / M4A1-S10,755

MP92,872

P2000 / USP-S2,792

Glock-182,439

MAC-102,262

AWP1,217

Five-SeveN737

Desert Eagle705

Galil AR586

Lifetime map wins

4,672vertigo

3,253inferno

2,686nuke

1,753dust2

137train

73office

69italy

35ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches

56%Win rate

2.04Avg K/D

—ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	4	50%	2.62	20.8
Mirage	2	50%	1.09	19.5
Inferno	2	50%	1.12	17.5
Nuke	1	100%	3.43	24.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy

42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.9%Spray accuracy

91.9%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

565msReaction time

32.9%T opening success

57.4%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

9.91HE damage / grenade

5.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.8701% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–8	0.07	14%	27 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.07	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.05	23%	17 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	6%	16 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.05	23%	16 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	12%	13 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	9%	13 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	7%	12 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.05	18%	12 Aug →
nuke	2–13	0.06	12%	11 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	25%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	19%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	14%	10 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.10	15%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.03	18%	9 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.04	11%	8 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.11	13%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.17	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	23%	8 Aug →
inferno	7–9	-0.03	21%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	14%	7 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	14%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.02	15%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	22%	7 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	20%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.09	17%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	12%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.06	9%	7 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.05	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.05	23%	7 Aug →
nuke	6–9	0.10	12%	7 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	14%	6 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	17%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	13%	3 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	0.10	7%	2 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.05	12%	2 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	14%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.07	16%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.10	19%	2 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	23%	2 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.07	15%	2 Aug →
ancient	11–5	0.07	22%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.10	20%	2 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.08	15%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.08	13%	1 Aug →
mirage	2–8	0.03	13%	1 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.04	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.03	17%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.10	24%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	0.12	19%	30 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.09	12%	30 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.05	20%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.02	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.04	15%	27 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.09	13%	27 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.04	15%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.11	18%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	19%	24 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	12%	22 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.05	11%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.10	16%	22 Jul →
inferno	9–7	0.14	12%	21 Jul →
eldorado	9–4	0.31	20%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.07	11%	21 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.10	18%	21 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.06	14%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.07	30%	20 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	11%	20 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.11	18%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.21	19%	20 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	14%	19 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.04	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	20%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	24%	18 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.13	19%	16 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	0.06	22%	16 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.06	20%	15 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.07	17%	14 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	0.11	16%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.10	24%	14 Jul →
debris	9–7	0.15	22%	14 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.03	11%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.08	18%	13 Jul →
vertigo	3–13	-0.00	23%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	15%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.12	15%	12 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.09	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.09	13%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	29%	11 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.04	15%	11 Jul →
shelter	11–13	-0.00	19%	11 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.06	19%	10 Jul →
shelter	13–5	0.20	26%	10 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.10	20%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.08	13%	8 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.10	21%	7 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.08	19%	7 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.02	13%	6 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	11%	6 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.06	21%	5 Jul →