โ˜ฃSา‰tโ˜ l๐•œeRา‰โ˜ข

โ˜ฃSา‰tโ˜ l๐•œeRา‰โ˜ข โ€” CS2 Stats

FR76561197996623400[U:1:36357672]Steam profile โ†—

501Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,445Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.8 Learning
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate34.4%42.1%42.1%7.7% short
Shot accuracy13.7%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.000.990.05 short
Match win rate42.5%42.9%43.9%1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGโ˜ฃSา‰tโ˜ l๐•œeRา‰โ˜ขFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning28
Utility43

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38โ€“55โ€“7Last 10038%Win rateWWTTLWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate ยท +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.2
Aggression1.9
Utility4.3
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 17% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 671ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped โ€” moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning2.8
Utility4.3
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04โˆ’0.03
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.04
Reaction time682ms+31ms
first โ…“ avg 651ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 682ms
Headshot accuracy9.2%+0.5%
first โ…“ avg 8.7% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 9.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating โ€” overpass 13โ€“2
13โ€“2Biggest win โ€” inferno
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5โ€“5In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map ยท 56% over 9vertigoWeakest map ยท 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD184โ€“1422%-0.03
infernoC166โ€“1038%-0.02
mirageA116โ€“555%-0.03
nukeA116โ€“555%-0.04
ancientC114โ€“736%-0.00
dust2A95โ€“456%-0.03
overpassD93โ€“633%-0.03
vertigoD81โ€“713%-0.03
officeโ€”31โ€“233%-0.09
cacheโ€”21โ€“150%-0.00
trainโ€”21โ€“150%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,849Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,974Matches
42.5%Match win rate
34.4%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy ยท Top 50% of Level 2 players
6,733MVPs
1,813Hours (in match)
4,771Bombs planted
577Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,641
AWP9,795
AUG4,633
P903,907
FAMAS3,205
SG 5532,588

Lifetime map wins

9,386inferno
7,505dust2
2,808nuke
1,374vertigo
601train
317cbble
193office
87safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
39%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
68.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage650%0.636.5
Dust2333%1.0917.7
Anubis333%0.9115.0
Inferno10%1.1515.0
Nuke1100%1.2018.0
Cache10%0.6012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.3%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
66.1%Counter-strafing
9.8ยฐPreaim
671msReaction time
17.4%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
4.52HE damage / grenade
11.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads โ€” usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.2552% โ€” below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training โ†’
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4048 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.3701% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy โ†’Vertigo grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13โ€“50.0512%31 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“5-0.095%31 Jul โ†’
inferno15โ€“15-0.025%31 Jul โ†’
mirage15โ€“15-0.026%31 Jul โ†’
vertigo9โ€“13-0.043%31 Jul โ†’
vertigo13โ€“40.0712%31 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0412%30 Jul โ†’
anubis15โ€“15-0.076%16 Jul โ†’
cache4โ€“13-0.0511%11 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.053%28 Jun โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.015%28 Jun โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0510%28 Jun โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0320%26 Jun โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0413%23 Jun โ†’
ancient5โ€“130.0711%18 Jun โ†’
ancient4โ€“13-0.035%18 Jun โ†’
overpass3โ€“13-0.1010%14 Jun โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.035%14 Jun โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.053%13 Jun โ†’
overpass13โ€“8-0.117%11 Jun โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.046%11 Jun โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0911%31 May โ†’
anubis13โ€“6-0.039%22 May โ†’
nuke3โ€“13-0.0615%22 May โ†’
overpass6โ€“13-0.0614%8 May โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.099%20 Apr โ†’
overpass4โ€“13-0.086%19 Apr โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.0411%19 Apr โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0318%18 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0517%15 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0110%14 Apr โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.048%13 Apr โ†’
vertigo10โ€“13-0.034%13 Apr โ†’
vertigo3โ€“13-0.066%13 Apr โ†’
vertigo9โ€“13-0.102%13 Apr โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0415%12 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“6-0.027%6 Apr โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.017%6 Apr โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.028%6 Apr โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.056%6 Apr โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0713%2 Apr โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0813%2 Apr โ†’
office4โ€“13-0.110%23 Mar โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.040%21 Mar โ†’
dust25โ€“130.0011%20 Mar โ†’
inferno5โ€“13-0.074%20 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.045%19 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“6-0.0417%15 Mar โ†’
overpass11โ€“13-0.0514%15 Mar โ†’
nuke12โ€“60.006%2 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0310%2 Mar โ†’
train13โ€“6-0.095%1 Mar โ†’
train5โ€“13-0.069%1 Mar โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.097%15 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.064%14 Feb โ†’
overpass5โ€“13-0.065%14 Feb โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0214%13 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0113%13 Feb โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.037%13 Feb โ†’
inferno13โ€“20.0613%13 Feb โ†’
vertigo12โ€“12-0.0616%11 Feb โ†’
vertigo5โ€“13-0.0615%11 Feb โ†’
vertigo12โ€“120.0014%11 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0511%10 Feb โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0015%8 Feb โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.044%8 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0512%8 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.057%6 Feb โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0513%6 Feb โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.066%4 Feb โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.037%4 Feb โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.059%4 Feb โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0915%4 Feb โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0112%1 Feb โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.0512%1 Feb โ†’
anubis15โ€“15-0.0110%1 Feb โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.069%31 Jan โ†’
inferno13โ€“11-0.019%31 Jan โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.025%31 Jan โ†’
inferno13โ€“30.016%31 Jan โ†’
dust213โ€“70.045%31 Jan โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0413%30 Jan โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0310%24 Jan โ†’
nuke13โ€“16-0.0311%24 Jan โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.017%24 Jan โ†’
ancient7โ€“13-0.0213%23 Jan โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.057%23 Jan โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.0011%23 Jan โ†’
nuke13โ€“6-0.017%23 Jan โ†’
mirage15โ€“15-0.038%23 Jan โ†’
office10โ€“13-0.083%22 Jan โ†’
office13โ€“8-0.073%22 Jan โ†’
overpass11โ€“130.049%20 Jan โ†’
overpass13โ€“20.179%20 Jan โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0612%20 Jan โ†’
anubis8โ€“00.095%20 Jan โ†’
anubis1โ€“13-0.0010%20 Jan โ†’
ancient3โ€“130.0111%20 Jan โ†’
ancient1โ€“40.024%20 Jan โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.028%15 Jan โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’