Rattleassa — CS2 Stats

76561197992090249[U:1:31824521]

1,339Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,788Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning39
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57385Last 10057%Win rateLLWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.8
Aggression1.8
Utility7.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 30% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning3.9
Utility7.4
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time567ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — inferno 9–0
132Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2314961%-0.02
cacheA148657%0.01
mirageC125742%-0.02
ancientS128467%-0.02
infernoB84450%0.06
poseidonS76186%0.01
anubisD62433%-0.02
nuke41325%-0.05
debris330100%0.07
overpass31233%-0.11
sanctum32167%0.03
fachwerk2020%0.05
train110100%-0.05
boulder110100%-0.02
shelter110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

212,987Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
7,241Matches
54.6%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
44.4%Headshot %
18.8%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
23,789MVPs
3,788Hours (in match)
10,615Bombs planted
2,911Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4751,645
AWP30,451
P2508,311
Knife5,940
P904,898

Lifetime map wins

19,015dust2
9,574inferno
5,373nuke
4,993cbble
4,693train
758vertigo
539office
400dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,493Matches
56%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
67.9ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23858%0.9411.8
Mirage2646%0.9613.5
Ancient2162%0.8812.5
Anubis1182%0.8615.2
Inferno757%0.8112.6
Overpass771%0.8812.0
Nuke580%1.1214.4
Train450%0.7711.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
585msReaction time
14.1%T opening success
30.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
13.6%Flash assists
11.45HE damage / grenade
11.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.1476% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0614%21 Aug
mirage1–4-0.050%21 Aug
debris9–30.0815%19 Aug
ancient13–60.0016%17 Aug
train5–0-0.050%17 Aug
fachwerk11–130.0917%17 Aug
cache13–30.0220%17 Aug
dust213–30.0119%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0011%15 Aug
dust213–8-0.0017%15 Aug
debris9–30.0015%3 Aug
cache13–50.0336%3 Aug
cache5–13-0.0221%20 Jul
boulder13–11-0.0220%9 Jul
fachwerk12–120.0119%9 Jul
shelter13–70.0217%9 Jul
debris9–30.1320%9 Jul
overpass3–9-0.160%6 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0711%6 Jul
poseidon9–50.0227%6 Jul
dust21–13-0.0624%27 Jun
sanctum9–2-0.0114%17 Jun
poseidon9–5-0.0721%17 Jun
nuke3–9-0.1121%17 Jun
inferno9–20.159%17 Jun
cache10–13-0.0021%12 Jun
sanctum9–40.1316%12 Jun
poseidon9–1-0.0124%12 Jun
poseidon9–10.1932%12 Jun
poseidon8–8-0.0813%12 Jun
overpass0–9-0.150%12 Jun
poseidon9–20.0425%12 Jun
inferno9–10.2514%12 Jun
dust28–130.0730%17 May
ancient13–20.0726%17 May
overpass13–11-0.0216%17 May
mirage3–13-0.0621%17 May
inferno5–9-0.0921%17 May
ancient6–13-0.099%12 May
dust213–5-0.0530%12 May
cache13–9-0.0320%1 May
cache13–90.0416%1 May
cache13–6-0.0116%1 May
cache13–110.0317%1 May
cache11–130.0328%1 May
cache13–40.0932%1 May
cache9–13-0.0416%1 May
cache5–13-0.0415%30 Apr
cache10–130.0325%30 Apr
cache13–2-0.0319%30 Apr
sanctum8–8-0.0222%27 Apr
poseidon9–50.0013%27 Apr
dust213–4-0.0311%27 Apr
dust24–13-0.0424%21 Apr
dust213–3-0.0115%21 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0119%20 Apr
anubis13–100.0515%20 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0211%20 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0316%15 Apr
dust213–90.0818%15 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0117%15 Apr
nuke8–130.0019%15 Apr
inferno9–00.2925%15 Apr
inferno9–40.0722%15 Apr
dust211–13-0.0516%12 Apr
dust22–0-0.100%12 Apr
dust211–13-0.0018%2 Apr
dust213–30.1120%2 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0237%2 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0111%8 Mar
ancient13–80.0119%8 Mar
dust215–15-0.028%8 Mar
ancient13–60.004%7 Mar
mirage13–110.0124%7 Mar
nuke13–2-0.036%7 Mar
dust213–6-0.0413%7 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0613%7 Mar
dust211–13-0.0517%7 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0520%7 Mar
mirage13–40.0523%6 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0310%25 Feb
mirage17–19-0.0315%25 Feb
dust213–90.0014%25 Feb
dust26–13-0.0727%22 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0817%22 Feb
ancient13–110.0119%22 Feb
mirage11–130.008%21 Feb
dust213–11-0.034%21 Feb
dust213–6-0.0510%21 Feb
dust213–90.0115%9 Feb
ancient13–80.026%9 Feb
anubis13–30.0119%9 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0512%9 Feb
dust213–3-0.0210%9 Feb
mirage6–1-0.049%9 Feb
anubis8–13-0.097%9 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0819%9 Feb
ancient10–13-0.089%7 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0614%7 Feb
anubis7–13-0.049%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →