naadz

naadz — CS2 Stats

FI76561197988048669[U:1:27782941]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

883Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,787Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,112Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18428 of 57649 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,911), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate58.7%48.4%51.7%above
Shot accuracy14.6%13.2%13.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.891.081.090.20 short
Match win rate47.1%47.0%48.7%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnaadzFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,112 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning49
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4951Last 10049%Win rateLLLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression2.1
Utility6.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.9
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time558ms+31ms
first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–5
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 53% over 19ancientWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB25131252%0.00
ancientC2071335%-0.00
vertigoB1910953%-0.01
infernoB179853%-0.01
anubisC104640%-0.01
mirage43175%0.00
overpass31233%-0.02
dust2110100%0.03
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

127,631Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
3,076Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
58.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8,970MVPs
3,787Hours (in match)
2,008Bombs planted
932Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4767,979
AWP12,539
P2501,455
MP91,261
Knife1,108

Lifetime map wins

9,417inferno
3,972nuke
3,900dust2
2,752vertigo
1,278train
305cbble
49aztec
40dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

961Matches
53%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
72.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8153%1.1115.8
Inferno7556%1.0915.2
Nuke7260%1.0615.2
Vertigo5165%1.0614.8
Anubis3040%0.9713.5
Dust22730%0.8814.0
Mirage1464%0.9612.6
Train1258%0.9614.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
566msReaction time
13.7%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
10.12HE damage / grenade
9.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3971 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.6775% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–160.0214%28 Apr
anubis8–13-0.008%9 Apr
ancient11–13-0.059%23 Mar
nuke13–20.0223%23 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0411%12 Mar
dust213–90.0313%12 Mar
ancient11–130.0510%11 Mar
ancient8–130.0015%9 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0521%9 Jan
vertigo13–11-0.046%6 Jan
vertigo3–13-0.047%5 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0320%10 Dec
train16–120.0212%9 Dec
nuke19–15-0.0014%27 Nov
vertigo13–70.0216%19 May
inferno13–100.0117%21 Apr
nuke13–90.0526%6 Apr
nuke5–130.0923%10 Mar
ancient8–13-0.067%8 Mar
vertigo13–11-0.0313%8 Mar
inferno13–70.0323%8 Mar
vertigo10–13-0.0718%8 Mar
anubis13–30.0823%8 Mar
nuke1–10-0.069%6 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0725%6 Mar
ancient13–70.0610%3 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0226%3 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0317%2 Mar
inferno16–140.0317%2 Mar
anubis13–100.0232%2 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0623%1 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0110%1 Mar
vertigo9–130.0212%1 Mar
ancient13–100.0220%1 Mar
vertigo13–50.0915%29 Feb
mirage16–130.0216%29 Feb
ancient13–110.0314%29 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0610%29 Feb
nuke13–80.0433%27 Feb
anubis13–40.0826%27 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.0015%27 Feb
ancient7–13-0.039%27 Feb
vertigo13–60.0014%26 Feb
mirage13–30.0224%26 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0222%26 Feb
anubis13–100.0619%26 Feb
vertigo14–160.0021%25 Feb
anubis1–13-0.1312%25 Feb
ancient13–60.0118%25 Feb
anubis5–13-0.085%21 Feb
overpass6–130.0120%20 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0813%20 Feb
vertigo3–13-0.049%20 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0112%19 Feb
vertigo13–80.0118%19 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0023%19 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0026%18 Feb
inferno11–130.0011%18 Feb
nuke13–100.0321%18 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0516%17 Feb
vertigo13–7-0.037%17 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0112%16 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0117%15 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0617%15 Feb
nuke16–140.0216%15 Feb
nuke13–100.0122%13 Feb
inferno8–13-0.065%13 Feb
vertigo13–8-0.0215%13 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0532%7 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0516%7 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.0015%7 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0610%6 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0223%4 Feb
nuke13–30.0624%4 Feb
nuke13–80.0116%1 Feb
vertigo13–40.0316%1 Feb
ancient16–130.0112%1 Feb
vertigo6–13-0.089%31 Jan
nuke16–140.0116%31 Jan
vertigo13–30.0720%31 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0216%31 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0312%29 Jan
ancient16–130.0511%29 Jan
inferno13–80.0420%29 Jan
ancient9–13-0.027%29 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0414%28 Jan
vertigo7–13-0.0113%28 Jan
inferno14–16-0.0312%28 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0113%26 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0118%26 Jan
ancient13–160.1021%26 Jan
anubis9–12-0.0621%25 Jan
nuke8–13-0.036%25 Jan
inferno13–6-0.016%25 Jan
inferno16–120.0325%24 Jan
nuke13–50.1513%24 Jan
nuke13–16-0.0313%23 Jan
ancient13–40.0719%23 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0010%23 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0412%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →