chopz — CS2 Stats

76561197985907459[U:1:25641731]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,321Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,731Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,787 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	58.6%	48.5%	51.9%	above
Shot accuracy	13.0%	13.3%	13.7%	0.7% short
Kill/death ratio	1.14	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	46.4%	47.0%	48.7%	2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning61

Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–48–9Last 10043%Win rateWLWTLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression7.7

Utility3.5

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning6.1

Utility3.5

Mechanics9.2

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact3.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time604ms−29ms

first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms

Headshot accuracy26.0%−3.1%

first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — cache 13–0

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 56% over 9mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	19	9–10	47%	0.02
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	0.01
nuke	C	15	6–9	40%	0.02
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
vertigo	A	9	5–4	56%	0.00
mirage	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	0.05
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
train	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

177,958Lifetime kills

1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players

8,222Matches

46.4%Match win rate

58.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players

13.0%Shot accuracy

20,501MVPs

3,823Hours (in match)

11,647Bombs planted

2,374Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4776,397

M4A4 / M4A1-S38,043

Desert Eagle15,286

AWP10,022

P2000 / USP-S7,450

Glock-186,653

Galil AR4,304

FAMAS3,850

MP72,932

HE Grenade1,712

Lifetime map wins

17,007dust2

14,817inferno

10,021nuke

4,170train

4,085vertigo

1,171office

847cbble

242aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

589Matches

50%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

77.9ADR

59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	114	48%	1.01	15.3
Inferno	93	53%	1.17	15.8
Ancient	81	51%	1.07	15.5
Nuke	80	51%	1.13	16.2
Dust2	66	44%	0.99	14.6
Vertigo	48	54%	1.06	17.0
Overpass	40	55%	1.22	16.7
Anubis	37	46%	1.06	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy

31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.3%Spray accuracy

91.4%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

605msReaction time

34.7%T opening success

47.0%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

0.4%Flash assists

11.45HE damage / grenade

1.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4743 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.722% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
train	13–8	0.06	21%	16 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	24%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	31%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	25%	12 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.10	27%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	30%	11 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.04	32%	11 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	28%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.05	26%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.05	19%	10 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.03	38%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	35%	10 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	20%	10 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	25%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	32%	9 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.02	36%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.08	20%	8 Aug →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	32%	5 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.01	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	19%	5 Aug →
train	12–12	-0.02	25%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	26%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	19%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	28%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	31%	2 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.01	29%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	21%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.12	36%	1 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.00	24%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.06	25%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.04	13%	31 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.22	18%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.06	41%	31 Jul →
train	13–10	-0.01	33%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.07	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.06	26%	29 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	28%	29 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	42%	29 Jul →
overpass	11–13	-0.01	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	16%	27 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.03	29%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	22%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	20%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.11	47%	26 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.13	22%	25 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	28%	25 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	-0.01	26%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	25%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	29%	23 Jul →
overpass	13–5	-0.02	17%	23 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	10%	21 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.01	29%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	26%	20 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	20%	20 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	27%	19 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.04	21%	19 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	24%	18 Jul →
vertigo	2–13	0.04	25%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	45%	18 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.03	28%	18 Jul →
overpass	3–13	0.04	24%	17 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	43%	17 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.03	21%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	37%	16 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.10	37%	14 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	35%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	19%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	44%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	23%	12 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.00	25%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.07	33%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	39%	11 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	21%	11 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.01	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	33%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.06	36%	10 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.04	36%	10 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	31%	10 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.03	33%	10 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	25%	9 Jul →
overpass	9–4	0.08	17%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.00	17%	8 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.02	25%	8 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.08	43%	8 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	23%	7 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.05	29%	7 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	-0.03	20%	7 Jul →
office	4–13	-0.06	38%	7 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	30%	5 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	25%	5 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	24%	4 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	14%	4 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	36%	4 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	27%	4 Jul →