J3r0enn — CS2 Stats

76561197984510996[U:1:24245268]✓ No bans

2,536Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,596Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating7,506Light Blue band · top ~66.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#31733 of 42388 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver IV

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=673), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	47.8%	41.2%	42.2%	above
Shot accuracy	11.2%	12.5%	11.9%	0.6% short
Kill/death ratio	1.05	0.96	0.98	above
Match win rate	43.5%	42.8%	43.6%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning45

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateLWLWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim4.6

Aggression5.6

Utility6.1

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning4.5

Utility6.1

Mechanics3.6

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time690ms−64ms

first ⅓ avg 754ms → last ⅓ avg 690ms

Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–2Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19mirageWeakest map · 38% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	10–16	38%	-0.01
inferno	C	20	8–12	40%	0.00
nuke	S	19	13–6	68%	-0.01
cache	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
dust2	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.00
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.09
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,215Lifetime kills

1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players

3,828Matches

43.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players

47.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players

11.2%Shot accuracy

7,148MVPs

1,576Hours (in match)

2,829Bombs planted

810Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,508

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,093

P2000 / USP-S4,642

AWP3,871

Desert Eagle3,194

Glock-182,923

Galil AR2,546

P2502,526

P902,203

FAMAS2,167

Lifetime map wins

9,680inferno

3,927nuke

3,179vertigo

2,942dust2

1,100train

341dust

297office

251italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches

38%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

91.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	2	50%	0.82	12.5
Nuke	2	50%	1.44	17.0
Mirage	1	0%	0.35	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy

35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

66.3%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

682msReaction time

26.1%T opening success

50.3%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

9.94HE damage / grenade

6.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.0954% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	0.01	24%	29 Aug →
cache	9–3	-0.01	10%	29 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.06	19%	29 Aug →
ancient	12–4	0.00	25%	28 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	8%	28 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	22%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.16	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	2–11	-0.03	15%	28 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.03	13%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	19%	27 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.04	15%	27 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	5%	27 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	20%	27 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.14	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	15%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.08	16%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	8%	26 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	14%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	8%	25 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	10%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	21%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	22%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	16%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.06	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	26%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	26%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	31%	7 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	13%	6 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.03	10%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	26%	5 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	28%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.00	15%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	16%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	13%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	14%	4 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	24%	3 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	9%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	15%	3 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	11%	1 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	19%	31 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	20%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	13%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.00	23%	28 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	10%	28 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	9%	27 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	9%	26 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	2%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.05	8%	26 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	6%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.01	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	27%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.05	13%	25 Jul →
inferno	0–13	-0.05	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	12%	25 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	3%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	4%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	17%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	16%	23 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	7%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	26%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	22%	18 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	13%	17 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.00	21%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	9%	17 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.04	9%	16 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	17%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	12%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	11%	13 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	14%	12 Jul →
ancient	8–2	0.05	15%	12 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	11%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.10	9%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	11%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	8%	10 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.02	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	15%	10 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.06	11%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	16%	9 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	23%	5 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	14%	5 Jul →
overpass	8–13	0.02	11%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–3	0.02	17%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.07	17%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.06	11%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	10%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.10	15%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.05	14%	1 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.07	10%	30 Jun →
overpass	6–13	-0.06	17%	30 Jun →