AllisonBurgers — CS2 Stats
76561197982648734[U:1:22383006]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 53.3% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 9.6% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 35.7% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 25 | 15–10 | 60% | 0.04 | |
| A | 22 | 13–9 | 59% | 0.03 | |
| A | 16 | 9–7 | 56% | 0.07 | |
| B | 13 | 6–7 | 46% | 0.02 | |
| C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | 0.06 | |
| C | 7 | 3–4 | 43% | 0.01 | |
| S | 6 | 4–2 | 67% | 0.04 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.03 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 47 | 38% | 1.13 | 17.1 |
| Anubis | 36 | 56% | 1.25 | 18.0 |
| Ancient | 35 | 63% | 1.30 | 17.5 |
| Inferno | 33 | 58% | 1.34 | 16.0 |
| Dust2 | 30 | 60% | 1.20 | 15.0 |
| Nuke | 29 | 66% | 1.42 | 18.1 |
| Vertigo | 10 | 50% | 1.08 | 14.2 |
| Overpass | 8 | 62% | 1.30 | 18.6 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.9152% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 7–2 | 0.12 | 21% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.02 | 18% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 19% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 31% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.06 | 17% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.09 | 24% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 15% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.01 | 35% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.14 | 26% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 26% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.15 | 16% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 17% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.07 | 28% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.06 | 27% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 0–9 | 0.06 | 24% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 6–0 | 0.03 | 42% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.01 | 19% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 23% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 19% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 18% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 30% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 17% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 17% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.01 | 19% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 21% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 8% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 19% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.10 | 14% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.04 | 25% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.05 | 24% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 21% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 30% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.06 | 22% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.10 | 13% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 14% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.04 | 17% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 28% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.12 | 26% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 16% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 17% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 19% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 10% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 9% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 18% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.01 | 28% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.05 | 13% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 16% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.15 | 27% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.03 | 16% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 16% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.15 | 16% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 22% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.05 | 24% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.09 | 18% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.12 | 19% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.02 | 14% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.09 | 16% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.05 | 22% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 14% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 21% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.14 | 25% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 16% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.15 | 18% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 13% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.10 | 30% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 19% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 21% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.06 | 21% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 36% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 24% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.13 | 18% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.07 | 24% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 20% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.00 | 14% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.09 | 19% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 23% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 26% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.02 | 20% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.22 | 27% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.00 | 20% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.06 | 25% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 33% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 7 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 23% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 25% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 25% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.08 | 22% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 22% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.01 | 15% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.05 | 21% | 3 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.