Orsted — CS2 Stats

76561197980524428[U:1:20258700]

189Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,473Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOrstedFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning57
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56422Last 10056%Win rateLLWWWTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.12 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression7.3
Utility6.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch1.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.7
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time550ms−111ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy30.0%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 30.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.35Best rating — vertigo 9–4
130Biggest win — overpass
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 89% over 9mirageWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1910953%0.02
nukeB157847%0.02
anubisS139469%0.02
mirageC125742%0.01
ancientS98189%0.01
overpassB84450%0.08
trainB84450%-0.01
dust2S75271%0.04
vertigoB63350%0.07
cache110100%0.19
stronghold1010%0.03
palais1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,179Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
1,603Matches
52.8%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
78.6%Headshot % · Top 1% of tracked players
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
8,338MVPs
1,473Hours (in match)
2,814Bombs planted
507Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,103inferno
2,365dust2
2,346train
1,765nuke
1,594vertigo
68office
45cbble
45dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

234Matches
53%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
90.2ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1250%1.2716.7
Dust2771%1.2116.7
Anubis3100%1.4517.0
Train367%1.5216.7
Nuke250%1.5222.0
Ancient10%1.0425.0
Inferno1100%0.9212.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.1%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
557msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
57.4%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
18.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7206% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0230%21 Jul
mirage9–130.0233%16 Jul
dust213–40.1440%16 Jul
vertigo9–40.3544%12 Jul
nuke9–10.2932%10 Jul
inferno8–80.0827%10 Jul
anubis13–40.0828%9 Jul
nuke13–20.0936%9 Jul
cache13–40.1924%5 Jul
inferno13–10.0534%27 Jun
anubis13–20.1232%16 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0223%15 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0718%15 Feb
stronghold6–130.0337%3 Feb
ancient13–60.0221%3 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0336%3 Feb
ancient13–70.0622%3 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0238%3 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0123%1 Feb
inferno13–50.0122%1 Feb
mirage3–130.0053%4 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0146%3 Jan
mirage10–13-0.028%2 Jan
nuke13–60.0831%2 Jan
dust27–13-0.0744%2 Jan
inferno13–50.0250%2 Jan
overpass9–20.2334%22 Dec
inferno0–9-0.120%22 Dec
mirage10–130.0637%31 Oct
mirage10–13-0.0017%31 Oct
inferno16–130.0527%5 Oct
mirage13–7-0.0424%5 Oct
ancient16–140.0322%5 Oct
mirage3–130.0926%10 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0312%7 Aug
anubis13–70.0016%7 Aug
train13–6-0.039%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0321%7 Aug
dust213–20.0720%4 Aug
mirage13–40.0732%3 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0514%31 Jul
anubis13–10.0221%13 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0122%13 Jul
dust213–20.0719%28 Jun
train13–110.0128%3 Mar
anubis13–110.0313%2 Mar
dust27–13-0.0319%18 Feb
vertigo8–80.0127%18 Feb
nuke13–90.0227%16 Feb
train11–130.0243%10 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0515%10 Feb
inferno13–90.1036%4 Feb
anubis13–10.1030%4 Feb
ancient13–90.0733%4 Feb
dust213–110.0424%4 Feb
overpass9–00.2332%4 Feb
inferno9–20.0423%4 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0418%2 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0222%2 Feb
anubis13–80.0233%2 Feb
train9–13-0.0222%2 Feb
inferno9–40.0129%2 Feb
train8–13-0.0026%2 Feb
overpass9–50.0732%25 Jan
nuke7–90.0110%25 Jan
inferno9–70.0728%25 Jan
anubis4–130.0028%25 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0530%25 Jan
inferno10–130.0429%25 Jan
anubis13–4-0.0018%25 Jan
vertigo11–13-0.0321%25 Jan
mirage13–100.0429%25 Jan
anubis13–3-0.0412%25 Jan
anubis2–13-0.0425%17 Jan
ancient13–50.0141%17 Jan
vertigo10–10.0020%17 Jan
inferno10–130.0533%17 Jan
mirage13–110.0226%17 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0429%17 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0223%15 Jan
palais4–9-0.1011%15 Jan
inferno0–13-0.0518%5 Jan
vertigo10–130.0416%5 Jan
train13–10-0.0826%5 Jan
train9–130.0831%4 Jan
mirage16–12-0.0314%4 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0330%3 Jan
dust213–110.0337%10 Nov
overpass13–00.1335%28 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0613%23 Sept
nuke13–30.0130%18 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0619%18 Sept
overpass8–13-0.0233%14 Sept
nuke13–100.0727%13 Sept
vertigo13–30.0431%13 Sept
inferno8–130.0721%10 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0125%1 Feb
train16–13-0.0328%10 Jan
overpass12–160.0028%5 Jan
inferno5–16-0.0131%21 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →