mito — CS2 Stats
US76561197979931009[U:1:19665281]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Pink band median | vs Pink band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 42.3% | 48.1% | 5.8% short |
| Shot accuracy | 6.2% | 12.9% | 6.6% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.96 | 1.08 | 0.13 short |
| Match win rate | 40.3% | 46.5% | 6.1% short |
This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 19 | 11–8 | 58% | 0.01 | |
| A | 16 | 10–6 | 63% | 0.02 | |
| A | 15 | 9–6 | 60% | -0.00 | |
| C | 14 | 6–8 | 43% | -0.00 | |
| C | 11 | 4–7 | 36% | -0.03 | |
| D | 8 | 2–6 | 25% | -0.03 | |
| A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.03 | |
| — | 4 | 4–0 | 100% | 0.06 | |
| — | 3 | 3–0 | 100% | 0.05 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.04 | |
| fachwerk | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.02 |
| office | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.04 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 1 | 0% | 0.53 | 8.0 |
| Dust2 | 1 | 100% | 1.64 | 23.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.187% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 15% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 13% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 21% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.13 | 17% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 16% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.06 | 21% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.05 | 6% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.06 | 8% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 19% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 14% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.05 | 17% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 9–2 | -0.06 | 13% | 25 Aug → | ||
| fachwerk | 13–4 | 0.02 | 18% | 25 Aug → | |
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.07 | 30% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.03 | 6% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 6% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 16% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.05 | 10% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.11 | 21% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.03 | 10% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 18% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.08 | 15% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.03 | 24% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.09 | 12% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 9% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.08 | 9% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 16% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 15% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.10 | 13% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 24% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 14% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 13% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.06 | 8% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 11% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.12 | 3% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.00 | 10% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 24% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.03 | 18% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.02 | 8% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.00 | 19% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.03 | 14% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.04 | 12% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 16% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 8% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 17% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.07 | 20% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.09 | 14% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.08 | 13% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | -0.02 | 28% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 21% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 25% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 15% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.10 | 24% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.06 | 14% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 15% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.02 | 8% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 13% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.01 | 9% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 13% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 14% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.03 | 44% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.06 | 0% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.09 | 16% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 17% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.17 | 44% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 15% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 14% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 10% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 16% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.02 | 0% | 29 Jul → | ||
| office | 13–11 | 0.04 | 12% | 29 Jul → | |
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 14% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 19% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.07 | 15% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 15% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 3–0 | -0.04 | 31% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.08 | 6% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.08 | 25% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 21% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 15% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 10–3 | 0.07 | 17% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.13 | 23% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.08 | 18% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 14% | 22 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.