luludag — CS2 Stats

76561197979119573[U:1:18853845]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,042Tracked matches31%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,319Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20760 of 57610 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning35

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–56–2Last 10042%Win rateLLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression1.5

Utility5.1

Positioning3.5

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning3.5

Utility5.1

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time604ms−57ms

first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms

Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.9%

first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L7Current streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 21% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.03
inferno	D	19	4–15	21%	-0.02
ancient	D	16	5–11	31%	-0.02
cache	S	15	10–5	67%	0.01
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.00
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.03
mirage	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

299Matches

53%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

71.6ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	59	58%	0.98	14.1
Anubis	49	49%	1.01	15.4
Mirage	47	49%	1.01	14.4
Dust2	45	53%	0.95	13.6
Nuke	28	46%	1.01	14.8
Ancient	28	46%	0.94	15.0
Overpass	25	64%	1.02	14.9
Cache	11	64%	1.07	14.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy

32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

76.1%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

605msReaction time

19.5%T opening success

26.4%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

8.08HE damage / grenade

9.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.391 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.4707% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	8–13	-0.02	18%	12 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	22%	12 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	9%	8 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	12%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	25%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	9%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	10%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	21%	6 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	21%	4 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.06	14%	4 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	12%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.01	18%	1 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	14%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	15%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	18%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	10%	1 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	13%	1 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.08	19%	1 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.01	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	29%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	16%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	25%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.00	19%	26 Jul →
shelter	13–8	-0.01	23%	26 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.09	13%	26 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	24%	26 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	17%	25 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.04	16%	25 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.03	20%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	17%	25 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.12	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.18	12%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.11	19%	25 Jul →
inferno	4–9	-0.14	12%	25 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.09	14%	25 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.11	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.02	19%	25 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	19%	24 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.00	11%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	11%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	21%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	16–12	-0.04	11%	24 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	13%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	13%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	13%	16 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	35%	16 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	27%	16 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	7%	16 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	27%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	13%	14 Jul →
cache	16–12	-0.03	19%	14 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.05	4%	13 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.04	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.05	11%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	16%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.00	18%	13 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	14%	13 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	10%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.03	19%	11 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	15%	11 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.02	33%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.00	11%	11 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	35%	11 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	31%	11 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	17%	11 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	36%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	13%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	12%	11 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.07	17%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	11%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	16%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	10%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	18%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	8%	11 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.04	8%	11 Jul →
inferno	7–9	0.04	10%	10 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	4%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.00	24%	10 Jul →
debris	3–9	-0.20	5%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	15%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	13%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	11%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.03	12%	4 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	18%	4 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.08	21%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	12%	3 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	18%	2 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	20%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	17%	2 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	11%	2 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	19%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.09	19%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.03	15%	2 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	19%	1 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	10%	1 Jul →