ke!ep — CS2 Stats

76561197967634527[U:1:7368799]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,760Tracked matches83%Win rate2024Tracked since

2,233Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,680Top 25% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5228 of 59447 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,003), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	38.7%	47.0%	48.4%	9.7% short
Shot accuracy	0.5%	12.8%	13.2%	12.8% short
Kill/death ratio	1.52	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	65.8%	46.4%	47.0%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning52

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT75–23–2Last 10075%Win rateWWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression8.0

Utility4.8

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning5.2

Utility4.8

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels4.5

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time533ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms

Headshot accuracy13.9%+0.5%

first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–0Biggest win — train

15Longest win streak

W4Current streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 92% over 13cacheWeakest map · 60% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	26	19–7	73%	0.04
dust2	S	14	11–3	79%	0.04
inferno	S	13	12–1	92%	0.05
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.01
ancient	S	10	7–3	70%	0.03
nuke	S	9	7–2	78%	0.03
anubis	S	7	6–1	86%	0.02
train	S	7	5–2	71%	0.05
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

126,719Lifetime kills

1.52K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players

7,427Matches

65.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 8 players

38.7%Headshot %

0.5%Shot accuracy

16,951MVPs

2,233Hours (in match)

3,582Bombs planted

1,107Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4767,063

M4A4 / M4A1-S26,547

MAC-104,181

Tec-93,988

P2000 / USP-S3,795

MP93,692

Glock-183,322

AWP3,192

Desert Eagle2,288

Five-SeveN1,308

Lifetime map wins

10,272dust2

8,094inferno

6,131vertigo

5,281nuke

2,885train

203office

88italy

12cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

93Matches

70%Win rate

1.51Avg K/D

94.3ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	27	74%	1.63	20.4
Anubis	20	65%	1.41	20.1
Ancient	16	75%	1.45	19.4
Inferno	12	75%	1.39	17.3
Dust2	10	70%	1.64	22.2
Vertigo	4	50%	1.50	20.5
Train	4	50%	1.48	29.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.8%Spray accuracy

73.9%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

535msReaction time

18.4%T opening success

66.0%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

10.8%Flash assists

12.67HE damage / grenade

2.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.0811% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.8932 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.357% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	13–3	0.10	12%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	25%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	15%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	9%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	21%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.15	16%	4 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.07	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.24	14%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–2	0.12	10%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.01	8%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.01	13%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	15%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	21%	16 Jul →
train	13–6	0.11	18%	16 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	9%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.10	7%	1 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	24%	1 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.00	18%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	18%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	17%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.15	12%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	8%	21 Jun →
train	13–2	0.06	8%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.01	13%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	19%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	9%	21 Jun →
train	13–6	-0.02	2%	21 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.06	13%	21 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.02	8%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	11%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.08	14%	20 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.02	14%	20 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	0%	20 Jun →
cache	13–3	-0.02	11%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.01	13%	20 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	20%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.06	19%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–2	-0.01	10%	20 Jun →
train	10–13	0.02	14%	20 Jun →
overpass	12–12	-0.06	8%	20 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	14%	20 Jun →
cache	13–2	0.09	8%	20 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	7%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.05	7%	20 Jun →
train	13–1	0.10	18%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.03	9%	19 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.00	9%	19 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	2%	19 Jun →
overpass	2–13	-0.07	7%	19 Jun →
nuke	3–0	-0.02	33%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.02	9%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.02	20%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	12%	16 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.03	7%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.02	17%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.07	16%	16 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.01	14%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.14	10%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.05	17%	16 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	14%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.10	19%	16 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	14%	16 Jun →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	15%	16 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.02	15%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.15	16%	15 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.06	10%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.14	9%	15 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	20%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.05	19%	15 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.01	13%	15 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.05	10%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.04	21%	15 Jun →
ancient	1–13	-0.11	22%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.07	12%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.06	11%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.03	16%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.06	13%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.09	10%	15 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	6%	15 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.06	7%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.10	24%	15 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	9%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.08	13%	15 Jun →
train	13–0	0.08	5%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.08	16%	14 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.06	8%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	5%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.03	8%	14 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.06	10%	14 Jun →
dust2	5–0	-0.04	50%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.04	7%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.09	19%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.11	18%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	7%	14 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.07	5%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–1	-0.00	12%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.08	13%	14 Jun →
train	9–13	-0.02	12%	14 Jun →
cache	13–4	-0.03	11%	14 Jun →