D1mmerMagi — CS2 Stats

76561197961582167[U:1:1316439]

1,889Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,977Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,544Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10099 of 31571 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,749 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate40.0%47.2%49.0%8.9% short
Shot accuracy14.1%12.3%13.1%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.080.10 short
Match win rate74.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGD1mmerMagiFACEITLevel 8 · 1,749 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,544 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning40
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46513Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression3.6
Utility3.6
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time514ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+4.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 11–0
110Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
L6Current streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB25121348%0.01
mirageC23101343%-0.00
nukeC146843%0.01
infernoA95456%-0.01
anubisC83538%0.00
cacheA85363%-0.00
dust2A74357%-0.02
overpass41325%-0.02
vertigo1010%0.01
sanctum1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,477Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
9,165Matches
74.2%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 8 players
40.0%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10,423MVPs
1,580Hours (in match)
3,356Bombs planted
1,087Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,398
P909,927
AWP8,356
SSG 081,847
Knife1,737
Tec-91,425

Lifetime map wins

6,725dust2
6,136inferno
3,262dust
2,189vertigo
1,933nuke
651train
424lake
325italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,132Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20351%1.0815.8
Ancient10854%1.0414.8
Anubis8449%1.0515.1
Inferno7748%1.0616.2
Nuke5853%1.1215.8
Dust25643%0.9115.1
Overpass3057%1.3013.9
Vertigo1974%1.0716.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
67.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
518msReaction time
23.1%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
8.10HE damage / grenade
4.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.469 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.062% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0321%29 Aug
vertigo9–130.0120%20 Aug
nuke16–19-0.0511%18 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0819%18 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0815%16 Aug
nuke8–130.0133%15 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0124%14 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0219%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0021%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0028%4 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0113%3 Aug
cache4–13-0.0218%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0627%2 Aug
mirage15–150.0622%1 Aug
mirage16–120.0522%31 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0121%31 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0428%31 Jul
inferno13–40.1027%30 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0510%30 Jul
cache13–100.0222%29 Jul
nuke9–130.0526%29 Jul
cache13–110.0333%28 Jul
nuke11–130.0219%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0722%28 Jul
dust22–130.0219%28 Jul
ancient13–60.0516%27 Jul
ancient13–60.0720%27 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0522%26 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0518%21 Jul
ancient11–130.0318%21 Jul
anubis15–150.0216%20 Jul
nuke13–40.0831%18 Jul
ancient11–130.0225%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0626%18 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0513%3 Jul
dust213–90.0019%3 Jul
anubis13–110.0321%3 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0115%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0523%3 Jul
dust213–10-0.0519%3 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0422%2 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0413%2 Jul
dust29–13-0.0935%2 Jul
ancient3–130.0226%2 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0116%1 Jul
dust214–16-0.0223%1 Jul
nuke13–50.0722%30 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0219%30 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0918%30 Jun
overpass11–130.0225%28 Jun
ancient4–130.0218%24 Jun
nuke13–50.1014%24 Jun
cache13–11-0.0423%22 Jun
anubis11–13-0.058%19 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0911%19 Jun
ancient13–50.0215%19 Jun
cache13–60.0447%15 Jun
ancient7–130.0414%13 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0323%12 Jun
mirage11–130.0321%12 Jun
ancient13–11-0.019%12 Jun
mirage13–60.0216%12 Jun
inferno14–160.0521%11 Jun
ancient13–70.0119%10 Jun
ancient9–130.0111%7 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0320%6 Jun
nuke16–130.0519%6 Jun
mirage13–50.0120%26 May
cache13–8-0.026%25 May
cache14–16-0.0116%24 May
ancient10–130.0014%23 May
ancient13–9-0.0318%17 May
dust213–100.079%14 May
nuke11–13-0.066%14 May
cache10–13-0.0015%13 May
inferno5–130.0117%13 May
nuke4–13-0.0314%9 May
inferno13–5-0.0414%6 May
ancient7–13-0.0124%1 May
ancient13–90.0115%30 Apr
ancient16–120.067%28 Apr
ancient7–130.0626%25 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0217%25 Apr
dust213–9-0.0512%19 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0018%28 Mar
mirage14–160.0220%28 Mar
nuke11–00.1119%28 Mar
mirage13–30.0016%21 Mar
mirage15–19-0.0814%21 Mar
anubis13–80.0212%21 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0422%13 Mar
sanctum8–80.0027%7 Mar
mirage7–13-0.099%7 Mar
mirage10–130.037%6 Mar
mirage13–110.0430%17 Feb
mirage9–130.0627%16 Feb
nuke6–13-0.059%10 Feb
overpass10–130.0029%10 Feb
mirage16–12-0.0314%9 Feb
anubis13–60.0723%31 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →