Mayo — CS2 Stats

76561197960546266[U:1:280538]Steam profile ↗

229Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,120Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,649Purple band · top ~13.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14094 of 29229 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	50.9%	47.2%	49.0%	above
Shot accuracy	15.2%	12.3%	13.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.02	1.07	1.08	0.06 short
Match win rate	45.1%	46.3%	46.9%	1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning62

Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD63–31–6Last 10063%Win rateLLWLWTLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5

Aggression5.7

Utility1.4

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch0.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning6.2

Utility1.4

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time506ms−45ms

first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms

Headshot accuracy25.2%−0.9%

first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — overpass 13–9

13–0Biggest win — anubis

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 30dust2Weakest map · 48% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	30	22–8	73%	0.04
dust2	B	25	12–13	48%	0.05
inferno	A	15	9–6	60%	0.05
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
vertigo	A	7	4–3	57%	0.06
overpass	—	4	4–0	100%	0.11
train	—	3	2–1	67%	0.12
anubis	—	2	2–0	100%	0.09
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,550Lifetime kills

1.02K/D

1,160Matches

45.1%Match win rate

50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players

15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players

2,932MVPs

676Hours (in match)

1,666Bombs planted

271Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,097

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,104

AWP3,737

P2000 / USP-S2,828

Glock-181,672

P90939

Desert Eagle812

Galil AR707

P250670

FAMAS539

Lifetime map wins

5,232dust2

1,998inferno

471nuke

232train

170cbble

138vertigo

35dust

19office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches

50%Win rate

0.64Avg K/D

65.9ADR

57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

11%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	7	57%	0.75	14.6
Dust2	5	40%	0.85	13.6
Train	3	33%	1.04	17.7
Nuke	2	0%	0.44	7.5
Inferno	1	100%	0.40	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy

31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.5%Spray accuracy

84.5%Counter-strafing

7.2°Preaim

501msReaction time

31.1%T opening success

39.4%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

11.80HE damage / grenade

5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4236 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.1162% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	7–13	-0.03	17%	19 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	10%	19 Aug →
mirage	19–16	-0.05	22%	14 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	39%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	18%	26 Mar →
mirage	12–12	0.01	32%	23 Jan →
train	11–13	0.13	32%	23 Jan →
dust2	7–13	0.02	45%	23 Jan →
dust2	12–12	0.08	25%	18 Jan →
train	13–10	0.12	47%	18 Jan →
overpass	13–9	0.03	30%	18 Jan →
overpass	13–10	0.10	31%	28 Dec →
train	13–5	0.11	31%	28 Dec →
dust2	13–4	0.17	35%	28 Dec →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	27%	28 Dec →
dust2	13–4	0.16	24%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.10	21%	24 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.05	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	17%	24 Jul →
vertigo	15–15	0.08	17%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.03	22%	24 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	34%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.07	19%	23 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	28%	23 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.02	26%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.16	26%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	27%	23 Jul →
vertigo	12–16	0.06	20%	22 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	20%	20 Jul →
overpass	13–9	0.05	20%	20 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.07	19%	20 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.05	20%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.09	36%	19 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	-0.03	23%	19 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.10	24%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.16	16%	16 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.00	22%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.16	20%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.14	27%	16 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	29%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.11	21%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	33%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.01	21%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.11	21%	11 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.05	25%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	17%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	33%	10 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.04	28%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	0.14	22%	9 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	20%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	20%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	29%	9 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.04	35%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.07	22%	8 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.10	38%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	38%	6 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	0.02	13%	6 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.08	30%	6 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.10	17%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	24%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–9	0.25	19%	6 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.04	25%	4 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.05	41%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.12	20%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.04	32%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	28%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	26%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	36%	2 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.04	23%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	16%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.08	31%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.17	33%	1 Jul →
dust2	8–2	0.04	32%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.04	27%	30 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.06	28%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–0	0.10	23%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.01	24%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	22%	29 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.04	23%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.03	30%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.02	25%	29 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	35%	29 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	12%	28 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	25%	26 Mar →
inferno	13–0	0.02	26%	26 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.08	23%	23 Mar →
mirage	13–3	0.10	15%	23 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.17	48%	21 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.10	42%	21 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.07	37%	21 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.02	30%	21 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.10	28%	21 Mar →
mirage	0–13	-0.10	0%	20 Mar →
nuke	13–3	0.07	29%	20 Mar →
inferno	16–12	0.03	16%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.07	27%	20 Mar →
mirage	16–14	0.10	24%	19 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.16	21%	19 Mar →
inferno	13–8	0.04	26%	19 Mar →