purrc-30 — CS2 Stats
IL76561199510384897[U:1:1550119169]Steam profile ↗1 game ban
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,502), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 6 median | Level 7 median | vs Level 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 56.1% | 44.7% | 46.0% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.1% | 12.1% | 12.6% | 12.5% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 0.03 short |
| Match win rate | 43.7% | 45.2% | 45.8% | 2.0% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 130 | 45% | 1.06 | 16.8 |
| Dust2 | 123 | 59% | 1.23 | 16.9 |
| Nuke | 51 | 51% | 1.04 | 15.7 |
| Inferno | 30 | 60% | 1.08 | 15.5 |
| Ancient | 28 | 50% | 1.05 | 15.6 |
| Anubis | 14 | 29% | 0.81 | 13.9 |
| Overpass | 8 | 12% | 1.00 | 16.6 |
| Cache | 4 | 50% | 0.88 | 18.8 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4116 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.2849% — below the 40% mark we flag