zyzzZz — CS2 Stats

76561199509070274[U:1:1548804546]

3,665Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating18,037Purple band · top ~16.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13673 of 26403 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning68

Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY82–18Last 10082%Win rateLWWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.09 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.5

Aggression10.0

Utility2.5

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels6.9

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning6.8

Utility2.5

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels6.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.10 → last ⅓ avg 0.07

Reaction time551ms+68ms

first ⅓ avg 483ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms

Headshot accuracy40.0%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 40.8% → last ⅓ avg 40.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.36Best rating — inferno 9–0

13–0Biggest win — mirage

23Longest win streak

1–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 26nukeWeakest map · 71% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	S	26	26–0	100%	0.08
mirage	S	23	20–3	87%	0.09
dust2	S	17	13–4	76%	0.06
nuke	S	14	10–4	71%	0.06
inferno	S	7	5–2	71%	0.16
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
office	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
ancient	—	2	2–0	100%	0.12
italy	—	2	2–0	100%	0.10
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (71% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches

57%Win rate

1.70Avg K/D

—ADR

61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	2	50%	2.29	23.5
Mirage	2	50%	1.46	17.5
Nuke	2	100%	2.04	20.5
Inferno	1	0%	0.29	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

36.8%Headshot accuracy

39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.4%Spray accuracy

84.3%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

567msReaction time

46.2%T opening success

69.2%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

8.7%Flash assists

2.80HE damage / grenade

2.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.5305 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	0.04	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.05	67%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.06	15%	15 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.05	37%	15 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	32%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	37%	15 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	28%	15 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	52%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	44%	13 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	50%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	27%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.03	16%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	30%	12 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.11	42%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	47%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.13	48%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.21	52%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.09	30%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.11	29%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.15	37%	11 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	25%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	36%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.07	36%	11 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.16	35%	10 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.18	38%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.09	29%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.07	65%	10 Jul →
nuke	0–13	-0.03	0%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.20	60%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.12	73%	10 Jul →
cache	9–0	0.10	100%	10 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	40%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.22	46%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.10	43%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.11	27%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.13	37%	10 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.09	45%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.19	21%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	52%	10 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.11	36%	10 Jul →
cache	7–0	0.07	18%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.00	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.12	39%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	21%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	24%	9 Jul →
office	13–9	-0.08	45%	8 Jul →
cache	6–0	-0.05	10%	8 Jul →
office	7–13	0.01	64%	8 Jul →
office	5–13	-0.05	40%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.10	43%	5 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.00	0%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.18	38%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	39%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	35%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.05	31%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.15	28%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	44%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	21%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	30%	5 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.00	0%	4 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.00	0%	4 Jul →
italy	13–1	0.10	22%	3 Jul →
mirage	4–2	0.24	45%	3 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	38%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.06	40%	3 Jul →
cache	3–0	0.06	67%	3 Jul →
mirage	7–0	0.03	19%	3 Jul →
mirage	5–0	0.31	42%	3 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.08	35%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–0	0.36	59%	3 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.09	50%	3 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.14	57%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–2	0.26	41%	3 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	32%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.20	50%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.18	28%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.23	43%	3 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.07	44%	2 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.01	24%	2 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.08	40%	2 Jul →
anubis	8–1	0.05	0%	1 Jul →
cache	4–1	0.02	100%	1 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.09	26%	1 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.11	44%	1 Jul →
nuke	1–9	-0.19	100%	30 Jun →
inferno	9–2	0.19	32%	30 Jun →
poseidon	9–4	0.11	35%	30 Jun →
cache	5–2	0.14	29%	30 Jun →
cache	13–2	0.16	45%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–0	0.09	32%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.02	67%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–0	0.04	26%	28 Jun →
overpass	1–13	0.00	23%	28 Jun →
italy	4–1	0.09	22%	28 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.15	30%	28 Jun →
train	4–0	0.12	75%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.06	38%	28 Jun →
cache	8–1	-0.07	25%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.05	36%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.09	16%	28 Jun →