conditioner

conditioner — CS2 Stats

AU76561199232772695[U:1:1272506967]Steam profile ↗

287Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
670Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,989Blue band · top ~44.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21525 of 30855 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate39.3%41.7%44.1%4.8% short
Shot accuracy5.4%8.8%11.4%6.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.510.971.03above
Match win rate63.4%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGconditionerPREMIER11,989 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning49
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59383Last 10059%Win rateLWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression4.8
Utility4.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.9
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time633ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — mirage 13–3
121Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 36infernoWeakest map · 41% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS36251169%0.04
infernoC27111641%0.02
nukeS2617965%0.04
cache42250%0.04
overpass31233%-0.02
ancient330100%0.10
vertigo1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,066Lifetime kills
1.51K/D · Top 5% of Blue band
961Matches
63.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Blue band
39.3%Headshot %
5.4%Shot accuracy
1,590MVPs
317Hours (in match)
489Bombs planted
350Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,177inferno
970nuke
566vertigo
489dust2
112train
23cbble
13office
8italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
627msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
6.33HE damage / grenade
8.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.8879% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–130.035%12 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0313%11 Aug
inferno13–80.0215%10 Aug
inferno2–7-0.088%4 Aug
mirage4–130.0842%4 Aug
cache2–50.0811%3 Aug
cache13–7-0.0111%3 Aug
cache13–6-0.0319%11 Jul
mirage13–70.0413%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0423%8 Jul
overpass0–8-0.080%8 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0123%8 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0317%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.028%6 Jul
inferno1–11-0.0020%5 Jul
inferno13–80.0129%5 Jul
overpass13–100.0814%5 Jul
nuke0–4-0.250%3 Jul
inferno13–90.0723%3 Jul
nuke13–60.1318%1 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0818%1 Jul
inferno13–90.0417%1 Jul
cache4–130.1220%1 Jul
nuke2–13-0.01100%1 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0214%28 Jun
ancient13–40.0516%27 Jun
nuke13–40.0122%27 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0119%26 Jun
mirage8–00.0113%26 Jun
mirage9–130.0313%26 Jun
mirage13–30.1214%25 Jun
inferno10–130.0112%25 Jun
mirage10–130.0615%25 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0213%24 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0819%5 Jun
inferno13–90.0317%5 Jun
nuke13–4-0.008%5 Jun
mirage13–90.048%4 Jun
nuke13–40.0014%4 Jun
mirage12–10.0815%3 Jun
mirage13–100.0114%1 Jun
vertigo9–130.0331%1 Jun
mirage6–130.0420%31 May
inferno13–60.0124%31 May
nuke13–50.0113%30 May
nuke8–130.0419%30 May
nuke4–130.0816%30 May
inferno13–30.1116%30 May
inferno9–130.0633%30 May
inferno8–130.0424%28 May
mirage13–60.046%28 May
mirage13–9-0.0416%27 May
inferno7–13-0.0315%24 May
ancient13–40.149%24 May
nuke13–110.047%23 May
mirage13–70.0413%23 May
mirage13–60.0610%22 May
mirage13–9-0.0413%22 May
mirage13–60.0213%21 May
nuke8–130.1314%21 May
mirage13–60.0513%20 May
mirage13–60.1514%20 May
nuke6–13-0.064%19 May
inferno13–70.0314%18 May
nuke10–130.0017%11 Apr
nuke13–50.1615%11 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0214%8 Apr
mirage13–30.126%8 Apr
nuke13–70.1113%7 Apr
nuke13–70.1416%7 Apr
nuke13–90.0814%7 Apr
ancient13–80.1018%6 Apr
inferno11–130.0925%6 Apr
mirage13–70.0314%3 Apr
inferno9–130.0022%1 Apr
mirage13–70.0615%1 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0131%31 Mar
nuke13–60.0618%31 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0013%29 Mar
mirage13–30.1021%29 Mar
mirage13–30.2616%28 Mar
nuke10–10.1010%28 Mar
mirage13–100.0312%27 Mar
inferno12–12-0.0420%27 Mar
inferno13–80.1416%27 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0112%26 Mar
inferno5–130.0823%21 Mar
mirage10–130.0210%21 Mar
nuke13–40.1717%20 Mar
nuke13–80.1322%20 Mar
overpass2–5-0.0422%20 Mar
inferno13–100.009%19 Mar
inferno12–60.0811%19 Mar
mirage7–13-0.069%18 Mar
nuke13–110.1314%18 Mar
mirage13–80.0528%18 Mar
nuke13–90.0622%18 Mar
mirage13–30.0612%18 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0623%18 Mar
inferno10–130.0026%13 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →