HarysX — CS2 Stats

76561199221175093[U:1:1260909365]

1,235Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since

1,654Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,999Purple band · top ~12.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17763 of 39410 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,115 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	63.5%	48.5%	51.9%	above
Shot accuracy	9.0%	13.3%	13.7%	4.7% short
Kill/death ratio	1.26	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	50.9%	47.0%	48.7%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning59

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression7.4

Utility5.5

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch2.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.9

Utility5.5

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time536ms−41ms

first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms

Headshot accuracy23.4%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — anubis 13–7

13–2Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

12–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 40% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	27	14–13	52%	0.00
mirage	A	24	14–10	58%	0.00
ancient	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.00
anubis	S	12	8–4	67%	0.03
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	0.04
cache	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.00
nuke	S	7	6–1	86%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,345Lifetime kills

1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players

1,359Matches

50.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players

63.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players

9.0%Shot accuracy

3,667MVPs

3,201Hours (in match)

1,325Bombs planted

429Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,757

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,725

AWP2,969

Desert Eagle2,382

P2000 / USP-S1,689

Galil AR979

Knife944

Glock-18895

FAMAS767

Tec-9326

Lifetime map wins

3,565dust2

2,254inferno

594vertigo

526nuke

417train

9cbble

1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,214Matches

52%Win rate

0.98Avg K/D

75.6ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	276	52%	0.95	15.3
Mirage	256	50%	0.96	15.0
Ancient	167	46%	0.94	14.8
Anubis	105	51%	1.02	16.1
Inferno	98	54%	1.02	15.5
Nuke	42	57%	0.94	15.0
Overpass	32	56%	1.02	15.8
Train	25	56%	1.21	15.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy

38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.4%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

520msReaction time

32.9%T opening success

45.7%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

8.20HE damage / grenade

13.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4696 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.8554% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–10	0.06	24%	29 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.03	36%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	35%	29 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	23%	29 Aug →
inferno	19–16	0.03	22%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.07	44%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	15%	25 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	17%	25 Aug →
dust2	1–7	-0.10	11%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.03	20%	16 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.03	18%	16 Aug →
cache	19–17	0.03	22%	12 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	17%	11 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.03	27%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.00	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	38%	8 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	30%	5 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.03	26%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	26%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	15%	5 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	13%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.07	20%	4 Aug →
cache	8–0	0.05	10%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.06	18%	4 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	50%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	25%	4 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.08	20%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	27%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.09	26%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	27%	4 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.03	23%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	19–16	0.00	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	29%	2 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	6%	2 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	32%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–19	-0.02	18%	2 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	31%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	27%	1 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.00	21%	1 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	25%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.01	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	17%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.09	30%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.07	30%	1 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	26%	31 Jul →
nuke	22–18	-0.00	27%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	8%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	30%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	31%	29 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.02	13%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	18%	28 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.10	30%	28 Jul →
dust2	10–0	0.12	18%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	32%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	27%	27 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	32%	26 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.07	27%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	17%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	27%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.04	33%	26 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	29%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.00	21%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	38%	24 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	25%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	34%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	25%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.02	31%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	24%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	24%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.05	21%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	38%	28 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	12%	28 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	13%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	24%	23 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	36%	22 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.04	23%	22 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.01	34%	22 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.10	14%	21 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	23%	7 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.00	17%	5 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	23%	28 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	24%	18 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.17	21%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.11	24%	17 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.21	22%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	20%	14 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.01	30%	11 Apr →
anubis	12–16	-0.03	27%	8 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	34%	8 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	31%	7 Apr →