brickhaed — CS2 Stats

76561199210761347[U:1:1250495619]

144Tracked matches56%Win rate2026Tracked since
182Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning52
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY563212Last 10056%Win rateLTWLWWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression1.6
Utility5.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 33% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics9.5
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact7.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time661ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–2
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
05In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 34infernoWeakest map · 53% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A48272156%0.05
mirageA34201459%0.05
infernoB179853%0.04
ancient1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,406Lifetime kills
1.51K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
223Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
63.8%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
0.0%Shot accuracy
622MVPs
82Hours (in match)
215Bombs planted
53Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

941dust2
345inferno
2office
1vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy
42.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
92.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
659msReaction time
15.8%T opening success
33.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
5.35HE damage / grenade
7.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.801% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–130.0218%29 Aug
mirage12–120.0827%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0517%26 Aug
mirage9–130.0626%26 Aug
dust213–70.1327%25 Aug
dust213–20.0931%23 Aug
mirage12–120.0529%22 Aug
dust213–20.0816%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0025%20 Aug
mirage13–70.0128%17 Aug
dust24–130.0125%16 Aug
dust25–130.0628%16 Aug
dust27–130.0619%15 Aug
mirage13–70.0828%13 Aug
dust212–120.1330%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0122%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0727%11 Aug
dust213–70.1434%10 Aug
mirage6–130.0628%9 Aug
dust213–70.0419%9 Aug
inferno13–30.1441%9 Aug
inferno12–120.0231%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0119%9 Aug
mirage13–90.1120%8 Aug
mirage13–20.2324%8 Aug
inferno11–130.0032%8 Aug
dust213–40.0327%8 Aug
dust25–130.0124%7 Aug
mirage13–90.0535%7 Aug
mirage12–120.1829%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0821%7 Aug
dust212–120.0831%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0731%7 Aug
inferno13–30.2041%6 Aug
dust212–120.0530%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0620%5 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0219%5 Aug
dust213–20.1024%5 Aug
dust211–130.0831%4 Aug
dust28–130.1333%4 Aug
mirage12–120.0735%3 Aug
inferno8–130.0218%2 Aug
dust213–5-0.0142%2 Aug
dust24–130.0822%1 Aug
mirage13–60.0317%1 Aug
mirage13–20.1924%1 Aug
dust213–50.0918%1 Aug
inferno13–60.0314%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0218%31 Jul
mirage13–60.1125%31 Jul
dust211–130.0528%31 Jul
dust212–120.0321%30 Jul
dust210–130.1021%29 Jul
dust213–50.0316%29 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0224%28 Jul
mirage0–8-0.0626%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0222%26 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0417%26 Jul
inferno13–80.0828%26 Jul
dust213–70.0629%25 Jul
dust211–130.1222%25 Jul
dust213–10.0320%25 Jul
dust213–10.0913%25 Jul
inferno13–30.0730%25 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0321%24 Jul
mirage8–2-0.0443%24 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0324%24 Jul
dust213–90.0624%24 Jul
dust213–60.0834%24 Jul
inferno13–50.1325%24 Jul
dust213–40.1031%24 Jul
dust22–130.0316%23 Jul
dust213–40.0229%23 Jul
mirage9–10.045%23 Jul
mirage13–20.0239%23 Jul
inferno12–120.0222%23 Jul
mirage13–10.1626%23 Jul
inferno13–30.0720%23 Jul
dust213–80.1027%23 Jul
mirage12–120.0627%23 Jul
dust213–90.0212%22 Jul
dust212–12-0.0331%22 Jul
inferno10–130.0422%22 Jul
mirage4–130.0418%22 Jul
dust213–40.0918%22 Jul
dust213–80.0736%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0726%21 Jul
dust22–13-0.0342%21 Jul
dust25–13-0.0127%21 Jul
dust213–10-0.0327%21 Jul
dust213–40.0319%21 Jul
mirage13–00.1638%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0029%21 Jul
dust24–00.0429%21 Jul
inferno1–130.0116%21 Jul
dust20–5-0.010%20 Jul
dust213–9-0.0121%20 Jul
dust213–70.0524%20 Jul
dust213–60.0527%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0020%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →