shittynuts

shittynuts — CS2 Stats

IL76561199208655612[U:1:1248389884]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,580Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,301Hours in CS34Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,282Purple band · top ~15.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15951 of 32135 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,351 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,282Peak Premier on CSDB
1,351Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,351
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,282
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,718 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate53.3%46.2%47.2%above
Shot accuracy0.4%12.5%12.3%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.061.07meets
Match win rate46.7%45.9%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshittynutsFACEITLevel 7 · 1,351 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,282 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,351csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning56
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56395Last 10056%Win rateLWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression8.2
Utility4.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time590ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–3
132Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
156In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 16ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2214864%0.02
dust2S1612475%0.02
infernoC146843%0.01
nukeA148657%0.01
anubisB126650%0.02
ancientD103730%-0.02
cacheS107370%0.02
vertigo2020%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,287Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,132Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
53.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
0.4%Shot accuracy
5,380MVPs
955Hours (in match)
2,436Bombs planted
539Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,493nuke
3,175dust2
2,083inferno
1,455vertigo
556train
17office
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

56Matches
59%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
85.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1560%0.8415.5
Nuke1267%1.2017.2
Dust2862%0.9315.9
Ancient650%0.9813.5
Overpass520%0.9614.6
Inferno333%0.9018.3
Vertigo2100%1.0914.5
Train2100%1.2015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
579msReaction time
48.5%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
8.57HE damage / grenade
5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.1668% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.085%28 Aug
dust213–110.0221%28 Aug
inferno7–13-0.038%25 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0812%24 Aug
mirage13–80.0021%24 Aug
mirage13–60.028%22 Aug
mirage13–50.052%22 Aug
dust213–70.0824%22 Aug
mirage10–130.0314%21 Aug
ancient8–130.0217%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0129%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0323%20 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0220%19 Aug
inferno6–130.0619%19 Aug
dust215–15-0.009%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0228%17 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0017%17 Aug
dust213–50.0420%16 Aug
cache13–70.0417%16 Aug
mirage7–130.0213%16 Aug
anubis13–30.1434%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.049%16 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0420%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0528%16 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0121%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.084%16 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0124%15 Aug
dust213–100.0612%15 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0932%15 Aug
anubis9–110.0118%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0311%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0311%15 Aug
dust24–130.0850%14 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0414%14 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0321%13 Aug
inferno9–70.0914%12 Aug
cache13–30.0425%12 Aug
anubis13–70.0820%12 Aug
dust213–100.0119%12 Aug
nuke13–4-0.056%12 Aug
cache13–9-0.0223%11 Aug
inferno3–130.0113%10 Aug
mirage13–70.1125%9 Aug
inferno13–110.0518%9 Aug
nuke13–90.0517%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0517%7 Aug
inferno13–110.1019%7 Aug
nuke13–160.0515%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0514%6 Aug
dust213–60.0321%6 Aug
dust213–30.0020%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0723%5 Aug
vertigo8–80.1126%5 Aug
anubis13–110.0017%3 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0223%3 Aug
nuke10–130.0628%3 Aug
nuke16–120.0917%2 Aug
dust213–90.0122%2 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0420%1 Aug
mirage13–30.0720%1 Aug
dust213–100.0515%1 Aug
cache13–60.0125%1 Aug
nuke13–110.0315%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0725%31 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0224%30 Jul
dust213–90.0117%30 Jul
inferno13–30.0318%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0314%29 Jul
cache13–50.0416%29 Jul
anubis10–130.0419%28 Jul
cache16–140.0616%28 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0516%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0121%28 Jul
cache8–130.0313%27 Jul
mirage16–140.0314%27 Jul
nuke9–50.1021%27 Jul
mirage9–130.0020%27 Jul
cache11–13-0.089%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0120%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0113%26 Jul
cache4–130.0322%26 Jul
nuke13–110.0220%26 Jul
cache13–40.0014%26 Jul
inferno10–130.0317%26 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0621%25 Jul
dust27–13-0.0220%25 Jul
ancient13–90.0121%24 Jul
mirage2–130.029%23 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0420%23 Jul
ancient2–13-0.035%23 Jul
nuke13–90.0111%23 Jul
anubis13–20.0219%23 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0521%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0621%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0110%22 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0412%22 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0116%22 Jul
dust213–90.0126%22 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0121%22 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0512%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →