[KRG] GangBツツ

[KRG] GangBツツ — CS2 Stats

DK76561199189509241[U:1:1229243513]Steam profile ↗

239Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
853Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,643Blue band · top ~30.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17815 of 27735 tracked
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate43.6%41.7%44.1%meets
Shot accuracy11.6%8.8%11.4%meets
Kill/death ratio1.430.971.03above
Match win rate45.6%43.8%45.2%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Purple band player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[KRG] GangBツツPREMIER14,643 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning51
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42508Last 10042%Win rateWLTLLLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression4.8
Utility4.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 672ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time669ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 726ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%−6.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.34Best rating — inferno 9–2
132Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
26In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2191243%0.04
mirageC1881044%-0.00
infernoC1761135%0.02
anubisD103730%0.02
ancientS96367%0.01
nukeD82625%0.02
trainS64267%0.04
dust2A53260%0.01
vertigo3030%0.03
office31233%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,890Lifetime kills
1.43K/D · Top 5% of Blue band
1,276Matches
45.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
43.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
11.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
4,897MVPs
322Hours (in match)
1,095Bombs planted
517Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,298inferno
1,841nuke
709dust2
500office
452vertigo
439train
116lake
60cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
50%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
62.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1100%1.0020.0
Overpass10%0.7112.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy
41.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
672msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
5.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6307% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.0282% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0213%28 Aug
nuke8–13-0.008%22 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0114%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0627%8 Aug
vertigo8–130.0810%31 Jul
vertigo1–13-0.0413%31 Jul
vertigo12–120.0514%31 Jul
inferno7–130.0129%28 Jul
mirage2–13-0.027%28 Jul
nuke13–60.015%28 Jul
anubis3–13-0.069%27 Jul
inferno10–130.0513%27 Jul
anubis13–50.0413%26 Jul
ancient13–20.0319%26 Jul
nuke15–150.019%25 Jul
dust210–13-0.0711%25 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0314%25 Jul
cache13–4-0.0510%25 Jul
ancient8–130.0523%24 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0422%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0521%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0720%24 Jul
anubis6–8-0.0615%22 Jul
anubis13–30.0412%22 Jul
ancient13–9-0.036%22 Jul
anubis9–130.0115%22 Jul
anubis8–130.1213%22 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0422%20 Jul
cache13–60.0418%19 Jul
inferno13–60.0717%19 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0813%19 Jul
cache4–13-0.0413%19 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0015%19 Jul
mirage13–100.0714%19 Jul
mirage16–120.0514%18 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0116%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0114%18 Jul
ancient11–10.134%18 Jul
inferno13–70.0215%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.089%18 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1126%18 Jul
cache13–100.0317%17 Jul
dust215–150.0013%17 Jul
cache9–130.109%16 Jul
cache13–6-0.0016%16 Jul
inferno9–30.1614%15 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0511%15 Jul
dust213–4-0.0010%15 Jul
dust213–9-0.0025%14 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0215%14 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0217%14 Jul
cache9–13-0.0124%13 Jul
ancient11–50.0321%13 Jul
inferno11–130.0424%12 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0023%12 Jul
cache11–130.0022%12 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0632%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0122%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0413%11 Jul
anubis13–90.0727%11 Jul
office5–130.1225%11 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0619%9 Jul
inferno15–15-0.029%9 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0111%9 Jul
office4–11-0.0419%9 Jul
office13–110.0022%9 Jul
cache2–130.0122%8 Jul
cache12–120.0023%7 Jul
train13–80.0315%18 Jun
train10–130.0311%18 Jun
train9–130.0328%17 Jun
nuke9–30.2015%16 Jun
cache5–130.0310%16 Jun
cache13–80.1223%14 Jun
mirage8–110.1024%7 Jun
inferno13–70.0724%4 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0311%3 Jun
inferno4–9-0.096%2 Jun
train13–20.0121%2 Jun
anubis7–13-0.018%1 Jun
anubis5–130.0011%28 May
nuke7–90.0413%27 May
cache9–130.0839%20 May
cache12–120.0114%20 May
cache8–130.0328%18 May
inferno9–20.3429%12 May
dust213–90.1421%11 May
mirage3–13-0.0528%11 May
anubis5–13-0.0026%11 May
cache13–80.0538%7 May
cache13–40.2214%7 May
cache13–80.0628%7 May
cache10–40.0927%6 May
cache4–130.1023%4 May
mirage13–80.1031%30 Apr
nuke2–9-0.057%30 Apr
cache10–130.0233%30 Apr
train13–80.0116%25 Apr
inferno6–9-0.0812%25 Apr
train11–00.1347%24 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →