d-13LL1 — CS2 Stats

76561199163822065[U:1:1203556337]

666Tracked matches67%Win rate2022Tracked since
421Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning42
Utility16

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5446Last 10054%Win rateWLWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression3.1
Utility1.6
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.2
Utility1.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time652ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA42251760%0.02
ancientB179853%0.04
anubisB147750%-0.00
infernoC145936%0.00
nukeS54180%0.02
vertigo42250%0.00
overpass42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,821Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
923Matches
43.6%Match win rate
38.6%Headshot %
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
1,976MVPs
421Hours (in match)
682Bombs planted
214Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,512inferno
643dust2
337vertigo
291nuke
45train
18cbble
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

590Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
73.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14062%1.1815.3
Ancient6650%1.0614.4
Anubis5254%0.9814.6
Inferno3540%1.0013.3
Dust21631%0.9313.7
Nuke944%1.0611.0
Vertigo838%1.0912.8
Overpass757%1.2316.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
642msReaction time
11.9%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
8.33HE damage / grenade
8.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 11.9224% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0122%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.089%16 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0813%24 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0118%21 Feb
ancient13–30.057%13 Dec
anubis5–13-0.0762%2 Mar
inferno13–70.1012%29 Feb
mirage8–30.1314%29 Feb
mirage13–70.0917%29 Feb
vertigo13–50.1522%29 Feb
mirage13–30.0428%29 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0416%28 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0219%28 Feb
mirage13–70.1918%28 Feb
ancient13–60.159%28 Feb
mirage10–130.0819%28 Feb
inferno7–130.0525%27 Feb
anubis6–130.0328%27 Feb
mirage13–80.2521%27 Feb
inferno13–40.0517%26 Feb
anubis13–60.1426%26 Feb
mirage13–70.2617%26 Feb
ancient13–20.1615%26 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0227%25 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0115%25 Feb
vertigo13–5-0.0217%25 Feb
mirage13–70.0118%25 Feb
nuke5–40.0411%25 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0820%25 Feb
anubis1–13-0.120%25 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0115%24 Feb
nuke13–30.0419%24 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0425%24 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0324%24 Feb
anubis7–13-0.1017%24 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0621%24 Feb
mirage13–110.0821%23 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0314%23 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0319%21 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0233%21 Feb
mirage12–16-0.0732%21 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0836%19 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0833%18 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0744%18 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0133%18 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0732%18 Feb
ancient13–30.0621%18 Feb
inferno1–13-0.0833%18 Feb
anubis13–100.0817%8 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0410%8 Feb
inferno13–100.0414%7 Feb
ancient13–160.0310%7 Feb
mirage5–130.0416%7 Feb
inferno9–130.0719%5 Feb
mirage13–90.0920%5 Feb
ancient11–130.1122%5 Feb
mirage13–40.1111%5 Feb
mirage10–130.0319%4 Feb
inferno13–70.0817%3 Feb
ancient11–130.0510%3 Feb
anubis13–40.0611%3 Feb
anubis19–17-0.008%2 Feb
ancient19–170.0713%2 Feb
mirage13–70.0512%2 Feb
inferno13–40.0619%2 Feb
anubis13–100.0813%1 Feb
ancient13–30.0315%1 Feb
mirage13–00.0010%1 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0013%30 Jan
vertigo3–130.0121%30 Jan
overpass9–130.1219%27 Jan
anubis8–13-0.072%27 Jan
ancient13–20.1413%27 Jan
nuke13–90.0729%26 Jan
ancient13–50.0627%26 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0410%25 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0713%25 Jan
mirage11–130.1021%22 Jan
mirage13–40.0219%20 Jan
anubis12–60.1013%1 Nov
mirage6–130.0612%1 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0014%28 Oct
mirage2–13-0.0021%28 Oct
mirage13–60.0514%28 Oct
inferno1–10-0.070%27 Oct
mirage17–19-0.0213%27 Oct
mirage13–100.1019%27 Oct
ancient16–190.0321%23 Oct
nuke13–40.0122%23 Oct
inferno3–12-0.080%23 Oct
inferno13–16-0.0317%22 Oct
anubis5–13-0.0819%3 Oct
mirage13–10-0.0313%3 Oct
overpass10–13-0.0615%3 Oct
nuke3–13-0.0814%28 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0319%28 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.1322%28 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0812%28 Sept
inferno9–16-0.0410%27 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0517%20 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →