AJODDSKI — CS2 Stats

76561199163747901[U:1:1203482173]

1,154Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating22,971Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5366 of 20890 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAJODDSKIFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,971 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning82
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44542Last 10044%Win rateLLLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.2
Aggression10.0
Utility2.0
Positioning8.2
Opening Duels7.7
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 53% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning8.2
Utility2.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time537ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−5.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 9–3
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 16dust2Weakest map · 7% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA1911858%0.04
mirageA1610663%0.03
infernoB157847%0.03
dust2D141137%0.02
cacheB136746%0.03
nukeC104640%0.01
ancientA95456%0.02
vertigo2020%-0.06
overpass2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (7% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

603Matches
53%Win rate
1.55Avg K/D
84.5ADR
23%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno9755%1.5219.8
Anubis9152%1.6520.6
Nuke8547%1.6020.7
Mirage7156%1.6420.9
Ancient3447%1.3919.4
Vertigo2759%1.4319.3
Overpass2264%1.7221.2
Cache2162%1.6620.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
535msReaction time
52.6%T opening success
69.2%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
4.86HE damage / grenade
1.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3604 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

7% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.0013%28 Aug
anubis5–130.0423%28 Aug
dust22–130.0330%28 Aug
dust213–60.0620%27 Aug
anubis13–80.1021%27 Aug
mirage16–140.1127%23 Aug
anubis13–80.1118%22 Aug
dust22–13-0.0317%20 Aug
anubis13–80.138%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0415%18 Aug
inferno8–130.075%17 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0338%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0413%16 Aug
anubis16–19-0.0010%15 Aug
mirage13–10.1214%14 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0212%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0011%8 Aug
nuke13–70.046%7 Aug
cache7–130.0522%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0414%3 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0011%2 Aug
anubis4–130.0421%2 Aug
ancient13–50.018%1 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0017%31 Jul
cache13–80.0523%31 Jul
inferno10–130.0122%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0524%31 Jul
inferno9–30.1533%30 Jul
dust210–130.0628%27 Jul
cache11–130.0710%27 Jul
ancient13–60.0129%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0019%27 Jul
nuke10–130.0213%27 Jul
cache16–140.0422%27 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0010%22 Jul
nuke9–130.0124%20 Jul
cache11–130.0119%17 Jul
ancient13–50.1118%17 Jul
anubis16–140.068%17 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0718%16 Jul
mirage6–130.0330%16 Jul
cache13–5-0.0121%16 Jul
cache10–130.0215%16 Jul
nuke13–100.0315%14 Jul
cache13–8-0.0327%14 Jul
ancient7–130.0115%14 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0020%13 Jul
dust29–130.1034%13 Jul
dust211–130.0120%13 Jul
cache10–130.0324%12 Jul
dust25–130.0826%10 Jul
inferno13–90.1133%10 Jul
nuke12–160.0213%10 Jul
cache9–130.1017%10 Jul
anubis13–100.0616%10 Jul
cache9–130.0110%10 Jul
nuke0–13-0.03100%10 Jul
inferno13–40.047%10 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0223%9 Jul
cache13–70.0611%9 Jul
ancient13–80.0824%9 Jul
vertigo2–13-0.113%8 Jul
ancient13–110.040%8 Jul
anubis13–100.0218%8 Jul
dust210–13-0.0118%7 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0027%5 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0126%3 Jul
anubis13–110.0610%3 Jul
mirage13–10.0819%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0028%3 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0222%3 Jul
anubis5–130.0760%2 Jul
dust210–13-0.0214%2 Jul
inferno3–13-0.1120%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0236%1 Jul
dust211–130.0528%1 Jul
anubis13–60.0546%1 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0313%1 Jul
dust215–150.0232%1 Jul
nuke3–2-0.0820%1 Jul
anubis8–130.0620%30 Jun
inferno11–130.0430%30 Jun
nuke13–110.0923%30 Jun
mirage13–100.1039%30 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0015%30 Jun
mirage13–80.1213%30 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0016%30 Jun
inferno13–60.1321%30 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0410%29 Jun
dust215–15-0.1018%25 Jun
dust211–130.0832%21 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0621%19 Jun
cache13–00.0240%18 Jun
inferno13–90.0314%17 Jun
ancient8–13-0.037%15 Jun
anubis13–50.1219%15 Jun
mirage16–140.0321%15 Jun
mirage13–80.0417%15 Jun
nuke10–130.0429%7 Jun
anubis13–90.0715%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →