Nos — CS2 Stats

76561199117811123[U:1:1157545395]

1,489Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,741Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate40.6%42.1%42.1%1.5% short
Shot accuracy14.0%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.000.99above
Match win rate45.7%42.9%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNosFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35
Positioning48
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.5
Aggression4.9
Utility5.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 684ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5
Positioning4.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time679ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 679ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — inferno 8–8
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 40% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30121840%-0.02
dust2A2011955%-0.02
ancientA127558%-0.00
infernoA127558%-0.02
anubisC104640%-0.03
nukeC73443%-0.04
overpass43175%-0.01
cache31233%-0.03
vertigo2020%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

65,380Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
3,347Matches
45.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
40.6%Headshot %
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
9,716MVPs
1,741Hours (in match)
3,159Bombs planted
1,048Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,524
AWP8,059
FAMAS1,479
P2501,195
Knife1,077

Lifetime map wins

7,510vertigo
3,593nuke
3,038dust2
2,727inferno
991train
334cbble
274lake
185office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
26.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.1%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
684msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
8.68HE damage / grenade
12.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8476% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.125%12 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0122%12 Jul
cache13–5-0.0213%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0417%10 Jul
mirage2–13-0.089%28 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0020%27 Jun
ancient10–13-0.029%24 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0117%22 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0540%22 Jun
mirage13–7-0.068%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0515%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0224%19 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0113%19 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0214%17 Jun
inferno13–70.0124%17 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0714%17 Jun
mirage13–80.0517%17 Jun
mirage13–60.0421%16 Jun
mirage6–80.025%15 Jun
mirage5–1-0.0740%15 Jun
mirage2–130.0326%13 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0014%12 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0320%12 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0013%10 Jun
dust26–13-0.0121%10 Jun
ancient10–13-0.029%10 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0212%10 Jun
dust213–90.0120%9 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0211%9 Jun
dust213–10-0.0512%8 Jun
nuke8–130.0115%8 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0222%8 Jun
anubis13–70.0213%8 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0126%7 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0517%7 Jun
dust215–150.0122%7 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0515%6 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0238%5 Jun
vertigo7–9-0.0419%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0116%4 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0313%4 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0311%4 Jun
dust211–13-0.0442%3 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0010%3 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0620%2 Jun
dust213–80.0116%1 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0213%1 Jun
ancient13–100.0216%1 Jun
mirage13–90.0217%1 Jun
dust215–15-0.0610%31 May
overpass13–70.0024%31 May
ancient12–16-0.0511%31 May
nuke16–12-0.0312%31 May
anubis11–13-0.0216%30 May
anubis5–10-0.0318%29 May
ancient13–4-0.0525%29 May
mirage6–13-0.049%29 May
mirage9–13-0.1020%28 May
anubis16–14-0.0415%28 May
dust213–100.0329%27 May
dust213–30.0626%27 May
overpass16–120.0011%27 May
inferno13–11-0.0320%26 May
anubis0–13-0.0211%26 May
dust216–120.0115%25 May
ancient13–40.057%24 May
anubis15–15-0.0419%24 May
vertigo6–130.099%24 May
overpass7–13-0.0314%23 May
anubis13–100.0113%23 May
inferno13–7-0.0718%23 May
ancient13–40.0310%23 May
nuke13–11-0.039%23 May
mirage11–13-0.043%22 May
inferno13–9-0.0038%22 May
mirage13–6-0.0129%21 May
anubis15–15-0.0615%21 May
mirage14–16-0.0519%21 May
ancient13–110.0114%20 May
mirage6–13-0.0022%20 May
mirage2–13-0.0717%20 May
dust213–9-0.0314%20 May
mirage13–9-0.0113%19 May
dust211–13-0.0413%19 May
inferno10–13-0.0219%18 May
dust213–11-0.0216%18 May
dust211–13-0.0013%17 May
ancient13–30.0720%17 May
dust25–13-0.094%17 May
inferno2–13-0.0321%16 May
mirage13–20.0126%16 May
dust29–13-0.1033%15 May
dust213–8-0.0115%14 May
inferno13–6-0.0516%14 May
mirage11–13-0.0929%14 May
dust213–30.0219%13 May
inferno8–80.109%12 May
cache9–13-0.0313%12 May
dust213–8-0.027%12 May
dust20–13-0.0817%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →