εχαмρℓє — CS2 Stats

76561199095695864[U:1:1135430136]

592Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,114Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,896Purple band · top ~16.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12298 of 23088 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate36.9%44.1%47.2%10.3% short
Shot accuracy5.9%11.4%12.7%6.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.031.09above
Match win rate56.1%45.2%46.6%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGεχαмρℓєPREMIER17,896 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning53
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateWWTWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression3.8
Utility4.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.3
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time625ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 625ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 30infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3022873%0.02
dust2S1913668%0.01
ancientB178947%0.00
nukeC114736%-0.03
infernoD81713%-0.02
anubisD61517%-0.02
overpassS64267%0.02
vertigo32167%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,240Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Purple band
1,752Matches
56.1%Match win rate · Top 5% of Purple band
36.9%Headshot %
5.9%Shot accuracy
2,538MVPs
568Hours (in match)
1,188Bombs planted
197Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,320dust2
1,498inferno
1,411nuke
1,222vertigo
398train
390cbble
1italy
1militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
624msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
6.36HE damage / grenade
6.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0062% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0820%22 Aug
mirage13–110.019%28 May
anubis12–12-0.0114%27 May
mirage13–60.0911%27 May
nuke4–13-0.1415%14 Feb
overpass13–80.0818%14 Feb
dust213–70.0314%14 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0115%14 Feb
inferno9–130.0116%14 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0122%14 Feb
mirage13–60.0014%14 Feb
nuke13–50.0111%8 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0416%6 Feb
dust26–13-0.068%5 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0515%5 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0213%5 Feb
ancient15–150.0122%4 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0219%4 Feb
inferno8–13-0.099%4 Feb
vertigo13–70.037%4 Feb
nuke13–5-0.0417%2 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0412%2 Feb
ancient13–50.0318%2 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0218%2 Feb
ancient13–80.0114%31 Jan
dust213–30.0825%31 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0115%31 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0016%31 Jan
mirage15–150.0117%30 Jan
mirage15–150.0411%30 Jan
ancient11–130.037%30 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0017%29 Jan
dust213–100.0223%29 Jan
mirage13–60.0513%29 Jan
mirage13–50.0419%29 Jan
dust213–6-0.0014%29 Jan
dust26–13-0.0120%28 Jan
mirage13–110.0417%28 Jan
dust29–13-0.0318%28 Jan
mirage13–00.1326%25 Jan
mirage13–90.0021%25 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0010%25 Jan
dust213–20.0224%25 Jan
mirage13–90.0420%25 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0410%24 Jan
dust213–30.0519%24 Jan
dust213–10-0.0223%24 Jan
nuke14–16-0.0612%24 Jan
mirage12–160.0210%24 Jan
dust213–11-0.0518%24 Jan
mirage13–20.0622%24 Jan
mirage13–100.0917%24 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0426%24 Jan
anubis13–100.0111%24 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0319%24 Jan
mirage13–80.0125%24 Jan
nuke13–40.0424%24 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0121%20 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0123%17 Jan
dust213–90.0218%17 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0414%17 Jan
mirage10–130.0415%16 Jan
nuke12–16-0.0819%16 Jan
vertigo9–13-0.087%15 Jan
nuke11–130.0713%14 Jan
overpass13–2-0.0116%14 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0215%14 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0119%14 Jan
mirage13–50.0713%13 Jan
inferno13–30.0614%13 Jan
overpass13–90.0311%13 Jan
mirage7–13-0.068%13 Jan
ancient13–80.009%13 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0012%12 Jan
inferno8–130.0212%12 Jan
nuke12–12-0.0121%11 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0417%11 Jan
vertigo13–10-0.0213%11 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0513%11 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0212%11 Jan
dust213–9-0.0218%11 Jan
ancient12–120.0815%11 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0517%9 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0411%9 Jan
overpass11–130.0221%9 Jan
mirage13–90.0116%9 Jan
inferno5–130.018%9 Jan
overpass13–80.0514%9 Jan
dust28–130.0017%9 Jan
dust24–13-0.0420%6 Jan
inferno11–13-0.1014%6 Jan
inferno12–16-0.0411%4 Jan
dust213–60.0615%4 Jan
dust213–80.1214%3 Jan
ancient7–130.0517%3 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0112%3 Jan
dust213–50.0315%3 Jan
dust210–130.0317%3 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0213%1 Jan
mirage13–110.0614%1 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →