e1ghtzmx — CS2 Stats
CN76561199086434316[U:1:1126168588]Steam profile ↗
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 2,053
- Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 447 to go
- Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
- Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Premier CS Rating
- At peak — 24,896
- Next: Red band at 25,000 — 104 to go
- Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
- Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
- Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 51.9% | 52.8% | meets |
| Shot accuracy | 11.0% | 13.7% | 2.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.17 | 1.08 | above |
| Match win rate | 47.5% | 49.2% | 1.7% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 24 | 14–10 | 58% | 0.01 | |
| B | 17 | 8–9 | 47% | 0.03 | |
| S | 16 | 13–3 | 81% | 0.02 | |
| D | 13 | 4–9 | 31% | -0.01 | |
| A | 11 | 7–4 | 64% | 0.02 | |
| S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | -0.01 | |
| S | 6 | 4–2 | 67% | 0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.02 | |
| office | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.02 |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 114 | 50% | 1.02 | 14.7 |
| Ancient | 94 | 55% | 1.22 | 15.1 |
| Inferno | 88 | 47% | 1.04 | 15.2 |
| Nuke | 86 | 51% | 1.06 | 14.9 |
| Dust2 | 58 | 52% | 1.14 | 16.0 |
| Anubis | 39 | 41% | 0.92 | 13.7 |
| Overpass | 24 | 62% | 1.01 | 14.3 |
| Vertigo | 6 | 33% | 1.31 | 19.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.4337% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 38% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.11 | 34% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 19% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 25% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.05 | 26% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 27% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 20% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.11 | 31% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 35% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 28% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 25% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 35% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 15% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.06 | 24% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 24% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 27% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.21 | 33% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 25% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 21% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.09 | 17% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 16% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 33% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 16% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 29% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.00 | 28% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 19% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 19% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.00 | 28% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 21% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.09 | 25% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 22% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.08 | 19% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 26% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 19% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 24% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 19% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.05 | 12% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 38% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.02 | 15% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.15 | 45% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 20% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 25% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 29% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 29% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 28% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.11 | 20% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.07 | 53% | 10 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.07 | 21% | 8 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 36% | 8 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 14% | 8 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.01 | 15% | 8 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 43% | 10 May → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 10 May → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 8 May → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 23% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 14% | 7 May → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 28% | 7 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 24% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.00 | 21% | 7 May → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 27% | 5 May → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.05 | 43% | 2 May → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.13 | 34% | 2 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.20 | 27% | 2 May → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 24% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.04 | 35% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.07 | 32% | 19 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 27% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 28% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 22% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 17% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 22% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 33% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.02 | 21% | 13 Apr → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.03 | 18% | 13 Apr → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 26% | 12 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 19% | 12 Apr → | ||
| 11–4 | 0.01 | 20% | 11 Apr → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.11 | 25% | 10 Apr → | ||
| office | 7–13 | -0.04 | 34% | 9 Apr → | |
| office | 9–13 | 0.00 | 53% | 9 Apr → | |
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 33% | 9 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 24% | 8 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 27% | 8 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 31% | 8 Apr → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.00 | 15% | 7 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 17% | 2 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 25% | 2 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 32% | 1 Apr → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.06 | 24% | 1 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 53% | 1 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.09 | 41% | 31 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 11% | 29 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 16% | 29 Mar → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
- 31Player 06213110 recent matches together
- 13Player 49461311 recent matches together
- 62Player 87636211 recent matches together
- 38Player 09423819 recent matches together
- 96Player 38789611 recent matches together
- 99Player 20149912 recent matches together
- 45Player 24384516 recent matches together
- 51Player 13745120 recent matches together