ImRickus

ImRickus — CS2 Stats

CA76561199086395005[U:1:1126129277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

817Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
601Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
Premier CS Rating11,357Blue band · top ~47.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25397 of 36093 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate44.4%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy11.7%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.120.990.99above
Match win rate51.3%43.9%44.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGImRickusFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,357 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning46
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45523Last 10045%Win rateLWLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression4.6
Utility5.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 747ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time742ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 759ms → last ⅓ avg 742ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 9–3
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2291341%0.01
mirageB179853%0.01
nukeC1771041%-0.02
dust2A159660%0.01
infernoB136746%0.02
anubisD72529%-0.01
ancientB63350%-0.01
poseidon2020%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,289Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
1,624Matches
51.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 3 players
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
11.7%Shot accuracy
3,869MVPs
601Hours (in match)
1,971Bombs planted
474Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,569dust2
1,337inferno
1,286nuke
460train
431vertigo
235lake
84office
75cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
747msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
8.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 747.0707ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2137% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0221%1 Jul
inferno9–50.0918%1 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1221%1 Jul
mirage7–130.0115%1 Jul
dust213–110.0216%25 Jun
mirage10–130.019%25 Jun
inferno4–90.037%25 Jun
mirage13–7-0.028%24 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0426%24 Jun
dust214–16-0.0417%19 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0210%19 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0516%18 Jun
inferno13–60.1715%18 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0124%17 Jun
dust213–70.0117%17 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0415%15 Jun
dust24–13-0.0221%13 Jun
inferno1–6-0.047%13 Jun
ancient13–90.0313%13 Jun
inferno11–130.0215%12 Jun
cache3–12-0.0413%12 Jun
dust26–13-0.0020%11 Jun
nuke13–90.0419%10 Jun
dust213–20.0519%9 Jun
poseidon1–9-0.0915%9 Jun
anubis13–60.026%9 Jun
mirage13–80.038%9 Jun
nuke16–12-0.028%8 Jun
inferno13–80.0615%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0616%7 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0112%7 Jun
dust213–90.0522%7 Jun
mirage13–80.0522%7 Jun
dust213–11-0.0313%7 Jun
inferno0–13-0.080%5 Jun
mirage13–100.0321%5 Jun
dust26–130.0215%5 Jun
nuke13–70.0318%5 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0712%5 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0423%5 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0110%5 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0222%5 Jun
cache12–120.0511%4 Jun
mirage7–130.0820%4 Jun
mirage10–130.0522%4 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0112%4 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0615%4 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0117%4 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0313%4 Jun
nuke13–90.0223%3 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0414%3 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0133%3 Jun
dust213–100.0027%2 Jun
inferno5–13-0.038%2 Jun
nuke11–13-0.058%1 Jun
cache13–20.0741%1 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0021%24 May
anubis9–130.0418%24 May
dust213–70.1119%24 May
nuke10–13-0.1011%23 May
cache13–5-0.067%22 May
anubis4–13-0.0623%22 May
nuke6–13-0.0523%22 May
cache5–110.0211%19 May
mirage13–30.0410%19 May
mirage13–90.0013%17 May
cache4–130.1025%17 May
cache13–80.0118%14 May
cache7–13-0.0529%13 May
cache13–8-0.0317%13 May
nuke4–13-0.0417%13 May
cache5–13-0.0712%13 May
cache5–13-0.0516%13 May
cache10–130.0319%12 May
cache8–13-0.0222%11 May
mirage12–12-0.0523%11 May
anubis13–70.0814%10 May
cache1–13-0.0710%10 May
cache13–80.0730%10 May
cache13–5-0.019%8 May
mirage11–13-0.025%8 May
cache13–30.0416%8 May
cache13–90.0318%8 May
cache1–130.0118%8 May
nuke13–90.0115%7 May
cache12–120.0425%7 May
cache13–70.0927%7 May
poseidon7–90.0318%6 May
inferno9–50.0720%6 May
cache5–80.0211%6 May
anubis9–13-0.069%24 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0513%24 Apr
dust213–5-0.0312%24 Apr
dust211–13-0.0011%23 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0213%22 Apr
nuke13–60.0226%22 Apr
dust216–13-0.0113%22 Apr
mirage13–8-0.018%22 Apr
inferno9–30.1953%22 Apr
nuke6–90.094%22 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →