MistuhLongDihfrmDaBack — CS2 Stats

76561199074115094[U:1:1113849366]

1,173Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,700Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,560Purple band · top ~22.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16570 of 28999 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	32.4%	42.1%	42.5%	10.1% short
Shot accuracy	12.1%	12.1%	10.9%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.41	0.99	0.99	above
Match win rate	62.0%	43.9%	44.2%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning49

Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–40–10Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLWTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8

Aggression4.6

Utility3.6

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning4.9

Utility3.6

Mechanics9.2

Opening Duels1.0

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time637ms+8ms

first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms

Headshot accuracy11.7%−1.5%

first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 8–13

13–1Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 40% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	26	15–11	58%	0.02
inferno	C	25	11–14	44%	0.01
mirage	C	20	8–12	40%	0.03
nuke	B	19	9–10	47%	0.02
vertigo	S	10	7–3	70%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

141,754Lifetime kills

1.41K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players

8,314Matches

62.0%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 3 players

32.4%Headshot %

12.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players

10,567MVPs

2,700Hours (in match)

3,158Bombs planted

1,476Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,337

M4A4 / M4A1-S33,513

AWP20,441

Desert Eagle4,773

P2000 / USP-S3,607

MP93,528

Tec-92,690

Galil AR2,300

Glock-182,294

SSG 081,625

Lifetime map wins

23,250dust2

9,120inferno

6,879nuke

3,361vertigo

817train

612office

172italy

149militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

145Matches

48%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

80.5ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	13	54%	1.27	18.7
Anubis	7	71%	1.09	18.3
Inferno	5	60%	1.92	14.6
Nuke	4	50%	1.26	12.5
Vertigo	4	25%	0.85	14.3
Ancient	3	67%	0.86	13.0
Dust2	2	0%	1.20	20.5
Overpass	2	50%	1.06	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy

41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.0%Spray accuracy

91.6%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

639msReaction time

30.2%T opening success

38.2%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

3.1%Flash assists

9.40HE damage / grenade

8.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.8968% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.1753% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	5–4	-0.09	11%	24 Dec →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	19%	17 Dec →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	16%	9 Dec →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	14%	9 Dec →
inferno	11–13	0.00	7%	9 Dec →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	13%	11 Nov →
dust2	12–12	0.00	15%	11 Nov →
inferno	7–13	0.01	10%	11 Nov →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	6%	11 Nov →
inferno	13–8	0.08	6%	28 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	10%	28 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.12	13%	28 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.02	15%	28 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.03	11%	23 Oct →
nuke	13–11	0.04	11%	23 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.04	12%	22 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.09	10%	22 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	11%	21 Oct →
nuke	1–10	0.02	17%	21 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	17%	21 Oct →
vertigo	13–4	0.10	14%	20 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	13%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.01	10%	15 Oct →
nuke	10–13	0.04	17%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.03	15%	14 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.10	3%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.00	5%	14 Oct →
mirage	13–9	0.00	18%	14 Oct →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	8%	14 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	9%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.04	9%	14 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.03	11%	14 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.00	8%	13 Oct →
inferno	13–5	0.03	14%	13 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.05	22%	13 Oct →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	3%	13 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.00	10%	13 Oct →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	17%	13 Oct →
nuke	12–12	0.01	13%	13 Oct →
mirage	4–13	0.05	11%	13 Oct →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	4%	12 Oct →
inferno	2–13	0.00	13%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	12%	12 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	9%	12 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.03	14%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	10%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	6%	12 Oct →
nuke	8–13	0.03	15%	12 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	14%	12 Oct →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	0%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.03	14%	11 Oct →
inferno	7–13	0.11	7%	11 Oct →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	11%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–2	0.12	12%	11 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	11%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–1	0.10	11%	9 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.02	18%	9 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.01	13%	9 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.09	18%	9 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.03	9%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.02	13%	8 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.08	9%	7 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	11%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.07	13%	7 Oct →
vertigo	13–2	0.06	7%	7 Oct →
nuke	3–13	-0.00	24%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.08	11%	7 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	13%	7 Oct →
inferno	12–12	0.02	12%	1 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.04	9%	1 Oct →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	4%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.04	13%	30 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.11	18%	30 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	0.03	11%	30 Sept →
nuke	7–1	0.06	6%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.02	22%	30 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	16%	30 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	20%	30 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.01	16%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	7%	30 Sept →
inferno	12–12	0.06	10%	29 Sept →
vertigo	13–11	0.08	16%	29 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.05	17%	29 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.02	12%	29 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.08	7%	29 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	0.04	18%	29 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.05	13%	29 Sept →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	12%	22 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	12%	22 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	8%	22 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	0.04	11%	20 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	17%	20 Sept →
nuke	13–5	0.06	10%	20 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.08	13%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.08	15%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–3	0.07	10%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.05	16%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.03	20%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.08	17%	15 Sept →
nuke	12–12	0.05	17%	15 Sept →