跟着水浪 — CS2 Stats

76561199052900454[U:1:1092634726]

3,380Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,601Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,220Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3396 of 12910 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,783 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.4%52.8%meets
Shot accuracy12.7%13.7%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.08meets
Match win rate43.9%49.2%5.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG跟着水浪FACEITLevel 9 · 1,783 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,220 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning47
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateWLWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression4.8
Utility5.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning4.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time581ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–6
133Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30141647%0.00
mirageB28141450%0.00
infernoS1611569%0.01
ancientC135838%-0.00
anubisA95456%0.00
overpass21150%-0.01
nuke110100%0.10
cache1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

125,520Lifetime kills
1.07K/D
5,792Matches
43.9%Match win rate
52.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
12.7%Shot accuracy
14,044MVPs
2,601Hours (in match)
5,603Bombs planted
1,597Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,877
AWP15,475
FAMAS2,096
MP92,070
P250973

Lifetime map wins

12,610inferno
7,464dust2
1,287nuke
1,269vertigo
444train
356cbble
141office
21ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

535Matches
54%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
72.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13052%1.0814.8
Inferno8069%1.3016.0
Ancient5258%1.1715.0
Dust24050%1.0315.4
Anubis2945%1.0515.2
Vertigo838%1.0814.8
Nuke50%0.9618.4
Train250%0.9014.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
91.9%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
589msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
13.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4672 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6599% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–140.1033%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0114%27 Aug
dust213–90.0413%27 Aug
anubis14–160.0320%27 Aug
dust216–120.0614%27 Aug
ancient11–130.0846%27 Aug
dust216–140.0123%26 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0912%26 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0726%26 Aug
dust29–130.0039%26 Aug
dust29–130.0117%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0623%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0431%24 Aug
mirage8–130.0123%23 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0123%23 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0421%22 Aug
mirage6–130.0330%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0427%22 Aug
ancient5–130.0032%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0230%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0238%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0325%8 Aug
mirage5–130.0023%8 Aug
ancient16–140.0221%8 Aug
inferno5–13-0.079%6 Aug
dust215–150.0122%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0713%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0218%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.0122%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0125%4 Aug
inferno13–40.0218%4 Aug
mirage8–130.0422%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0116%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0425%4 Aug
anubis13–70.0439%4 Aug
dust26–130.0522%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0123%4 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0637%1 Aug
cache8–13-0.0324%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.0118%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0527%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.0138%29 Jul
anubis13–9-0.029%11 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0331%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.124%9 Jul
inferno13–40.0717%9 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0111%9 Jul
dust213–11-0.0313%9 Jul
anubis13–30.0645%9 Jul
dust27–130.0220%9 Jul
mirage13–40.0833%9 Jul
inferno13–50.1227%8 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0430%6 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0033%6 Jul
mirage13–80.0724%5 Jul
dust216–130.0230%5 Jul
dust24–13-0.0523%5 Jul
dust213–5-0.0127%5 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0013%5 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0718%5 Jul
dust213–30.0821%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0314%5 Jul
dust213–50.0219%4 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0226%4 Jul
ancient6–130.0128%3 Jul
overpass6–00.0013%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0317%3 Jul
anubis13–3-0.028%2 Jul
inferno9–130.0115%1 Jul
ancient13–70.0846%1 Jul
inferno13–100.0515%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0218%30 Jun
inferno13–90.0130%30 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0418%30 Jun
dust213–110.0320%29 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0528%29 Jun
anubis13–90.0415%28 Jun
mirage13–60.1412%28 Jun
dust213–10-0.0129%27 Jun
mirage13–50.0717%27 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0219%27 Jun
mirage10–130.0417%27 Jun
inferno13–90.0326%27 Jun
inferno13–160.0119%26 Jun
dust213–9-0.0012%26 Jun
ancient11–130.0620%24 Jun
inferno6–130.0341%24 Jun
dust25–130.0627%22 Jun
mirage9–130.0013%22 Jun
dust213–80.027%22 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0123%21 Jun
dust211–130.0028%21 Jun
mirage16–120.0225%20 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0328%20 Jun
inferno13–9-0.1019%18 Jun
inferno11–130.0130%17 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0312%8 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0226%6 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0422%29 May
inferno13–80.0243%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →