4_e

4_e — CS2 Stats

US76561199050143279[U:1:1089877551]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

769Tracked matches56%Win rate2022Tracked since
679Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating10,634Blue band · top ~51.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20771 of 28856 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate44.7%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy10.4%12.9%12.1%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.000.990.11 short
Match win rate43.3%42.9%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG4_eFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER10,634 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning42
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44488Last 10044%Win rateTWWWWWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression4.5
Utility4.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact6.9

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time668ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 6–1
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
82In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 21infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30151550%-0.05
nukeA2112957%-0.05
cacheC114736%-0.06
vertigoC94544%-0.07
infernoD82625%-0.04
mirageD72529%-0.06
ancientD72529%-0.06
anubis31233%-0.04
train21150%-0.06
overpass21150%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,351Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
792Matches
43.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
44.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
10.4%Shot accuracy
1,254MVPs
275Hours (in match)
177Bombs planted
130Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,568dust2
1,523nuke
707inferno
352vertigo
30office
22train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches
38%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
673msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
30.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
7.47HE damage / grenade
8.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2756% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–12-0.104%28 Aug
dust213–60.0226%28 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0426%27 Aug
cache13–2-0.0910%27 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0120%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.0017%27 Aug
ancient13–110.0019%27 Aug
anubis7–13-0.129%25 Aug
mirage12–120.0017%25 Aug
cache8–13-0.048%25 Aug
nuke7–130.0136%25 Aug
inferno7–130.019%24 Aug
cache6–10.13100%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0410%24 Aug
dust213–6-0.0510%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0511%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0910%20 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0115%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0710%19 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0513%19 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0319%18 Aug
inferno10–13-0.077%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.066%18 Aug
dust27–13-0.1129%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0020%7 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0517%7 Aug
dust212–12-0.0918%7 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0718%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0710%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.0710%29 Jul
vertigo13–10-0.0612%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.0222%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.079%29 Jul
nuke9–0-0.086%28 Jul
inferno3–9-0.115%28 Jul
cache5–13-0.062%28 Jul
inferno6–13-0.107%28 Jul
dust28–13-0.0619%27 Jul
cache9–13-0.0614%27 Jul
dust213–90.0227%27 Jul
dust213–3-0.039%26 Jul
dust213–9-0.0217%24 Jul
nuke13–8-0.088%24 Jul
dust22–13-0.103%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.094%17 Jul
cache12–12-0.103%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0510%17 Jul
vertigo13–4-0.1011%17 Jul
nuke13–7-0.073%17 Jul
cache9–13-0.0710%17 Jul
dust212–12-0.0013%17 Jul
cache13–9-0.040%16 Jul
inferno13–10.0514%16 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1111%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.096%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.145%16 Jul
nuke12–12-0.032%15 Jul
dust23–13-0.040%15 Jul
cache2–6-0.150%7 May
nuke2–13-0.0132%5 Dec
dust213–5-0.0321%5 Dec
anubis12–120.0115%4 Dec
train13–10-0.0820%4 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0214%4 Dec
dust213–1-0.0217%4 Dec
inferno13–10-0.100%3 Dec
train9–13-0.045%3 Dec
dust21–13-0.0638%3 Dec
nuke13–11-0.079%7 Jun
vertigo10–13-0.0614%7 Jun
dust25–13-0.1630%5 Jun
ancient11–13-0.110%4 Jun
mirage2–13-0.1219%3 Jun
dust24–13-0.1219%2 Jun
dust29–13-0.0710%1 Mar
vertigo3–13-0.1019%1 Mar
dust23–13-0.0929%29 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0326%29 Feb
anubis13–110.0017%27 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0220%27 Feb
vertigo9–60.0111%27 Feb
dust26–130.0320%26 Feb
vertigo4–13-0.1113%22 Feb
dust213–8-0.0218%22 Feb
dust28–10.015%21 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0719%21 Feb
dust213–10-0.0220%21 Feb
inferno12–120.0422%21 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0316%21 Feb
overpass13–6-0.1111%20 Feb
vertigo13–8-0.075%20 Feb
dust213–110.0912%20 Feb
inferno3–8-0.057%19 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0614%19 Feb
dust23–13-0.1019%19 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0510%19 Feb
dust28–13-0.1225%19 Feb
nuke9–1-0.0213%19 Feb
vertigo3–13-0.0613%19 Feb
vertigo6–13-0.090%17 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →