240hz — CS2 Stats

76561199037592947[U:1:1077327219]

128Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
385Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate42.4%42.1%42.1%meets
Shot accuracy17.5%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.000.99above
Match win rate44.3%42.9%43.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 3 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG240hzFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning48
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT42544Last 10042%Win rateWLWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4
Aggression4.1
Utility2.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.8
Utility2.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time724ms+45ms
first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 724ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 11–16
163Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
50Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 17vertigoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC29121741%-0.02
infernoD29101934%-0.01
dust2S1711665%0.00
nukeD72529%-0.01
ancientB63350%-0.05
vertigoD51420%-0.03
overpass32167%0.00
train2020%0.02
tuscan21150%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,464Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
1,143Matches
44.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
42.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
17.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 2 players
3,583MVPs
385Hours (in match)
1,379Bombs planted
259Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,587inferno
1,010office
820dust2
454lake
418vertigo
379nuke
304train
113cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
711msReaction time
20.9%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.09HE damage / grenade
6.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 711.2496ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.9119% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0419%15 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0421%15 Jul
dust213–90.0535%5 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0512%7 Aug
train8–130.0217%5 Aug
nuke13–100.0317%5 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0218%4 Aug
dust216–130.0313%3 Aug
inferno13–4-0.023%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0519%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.054%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0119%27 Jul
mirage15–15-0.047%27 Jul
inferno11–130.0221%27 Jul
mirage13–20.0516%27 Jul
overpass13–60.0119%18 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0014%16 Jul
nuke3–13-0.047%14 Jul
train7–130.0113%13 Jul
ancient6–13-0.105%12 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0110%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0217%11 Jul
dust213–7-0.0412%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0119%10 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0210%9 Jul
mirage6–130.0432%8 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0310%8 Jul
inferno0–9-0.2111%7 Jul
dust29–130.0914%7 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0627%6 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0626%2 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0819%2 Jul
mirage13–110.0317%2 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0016%1 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0417%1 Jul
inferno3–9-0.140%30 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0913%30 Jun
dust213–20.0420%29 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0620%27 Jun
dust27–13-0.0316%27 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0036%27 Dec
vertigo5–13-0.0717%27 Dec
mirage13–70.039%27 Dec
vertigo15–150.0810%26 Dec
inferno5–130.0119%25 Dec
vertigo13–11-0.0612%25 Dec
vertigo14–16-0.0118%24 Dec
inferno13–100.0414%24 Dec
mirage10–130.0317%24 Dec
vertigo0–13-0.0814%21 Dec
mirage1–13-0.1124%21 Dec
mirage11–30.0918%21 Dec
dust212–12-0.0314%20 Nov
dust216–13-0.0213%30 Apr
dust25–16-0.0017%8 Mar
mirage10–16-0.0315%8 Mar
tuscan15–150.0914%20 Nov
inferno16–60.1211%26 Oct
dust216–130.0112%24 Oct
inferno11–16-0.0312%5 Oct
nuke28–250.007%3 Oct
mirage7–16-0.140%1 Oct
tuscan16–40.0814%26 Sept
mirage7–16-0.068%7 Sept
dust216–140.0213%6 Sept
mirage1–12-0.0415%4 Sept
ancient9–70.0217%28 Aug
inferno4–16-0.107%27 Aug
inferno11–160.1311%20 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0515%19 Aug
ancient5–16-0.145%18 Aug
mirage8–16-0.0717%15 Aug
ancient16–14-0.049%12 Aug
inferno11–160.0012%10 Aug
inferno16–130.0112%8 Aug
inferno16–7-0.0310%8 Aug
mirage16–13-0.037%5 Aug
mirage13–16-0.018%20 Jul
nuke5–16-0.0520%14 Jul
inferno22–20-0.087%14 Jul
inferno9–160.029%11 Jul
mirage5–16-0.0511%11 Jul
mirage6–160.026%11 Jul
inferno16–40.1115%10 Jul
dust25–16-0.0514%9 Jul
inferno14–30.035%9 Jul
inferno17–190.084%9 Jul
mirage16–130.0417%9 Jul
dust212–16-0.0516%28 Jun
inferno12–16-0.038%28 Jun
overpass16–90.0611%27 Jun
nuke9–160.0414%26 Jun
mirage16–130.0124%25 Jun
inferno8–16-0.0229%17 Jun
dust216–30.0720%16 Jun
dust216–6-0.0413%15 Jun
dust216–30.0310%13 Jun
mirage7–160.0029%12 Jun
inferno14–160.0118%12 Jun
mirage10–16-0.0510%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →