Mayo — CS2 Stats

76561199026612055[U:1:1066346327]

88Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
226Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
Premier CS Rating15,266Purple band · top ~27.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5172 of 7968 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate43.1%48.1%5.0% short
Shot accuracy5.0%12.9%7.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.561.08above
Match win rate50.1%46.5%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMayoPREMIER15,266 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning45
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42368Last 8649%Win rateLWTLLWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression3.9
Utility2.2
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.5
Utility2.2
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time630ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 86 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 13–1
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25131252%0.01
mirageB189950%0.02
nukeB105550%0.01
infernoC94544%0.01
anubisC73443%0.04
ancientS75271%0.07
overpassD51420%0.02
cache32167%0.02
warden1010%0.01
vertigo1010%0.04

Across the last 86 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

7,304Lifetime kills
1.56K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
451Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
43.1%Headshot %
5.0%Shot accuracy
773MVPs
117Hours (in match)
265Bombs planted
74Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

841dust2
231nuke
199inferno
165vertigo
18cbble
13train
6office
5ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
631msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
4.06HE damage / grenade
2.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3706% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.6293 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.083% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–9-0.176%17 Jul
dust213–80.039%16 Jul
warden12–120.019%18 Jun
mirage9–130.0712%16 Jun
dust28–13-0.0715%16 Jun
mirage13–80.1410%15 Jun
dust23–13-0.0016%15 Jun
dust215–15-0.0611%13 Jun
dust212–16-0.0515%13 Jun
inferno13–60.1518%11 Jun
nuke13–50.046%11 Jun
anubis13–60.0516%11 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0118%11 Jun
ancient11–30.058%11 Jun
dust213–80.0232%11 Jun
nuke13–60.017%11 Jun
dust213–40.0713%11 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0818%11 Jun
mirage6–130.0022%10 Jun
mirage13–10-0.018%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0110%10 Jun
dust213–60.0522%10 Jun
ancient13–40.1511%10 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0223%23 May
nuke13–16-0.049%23 May
nuke13–4-0.0217%23 May
dust211–13-0.0214%23 May
mirage10–13-0.059%23 May
nuke13–9-0.0315%23 May
mirage13–10-0.058%22 May
anubis7–13-0.014%21 May
mirage13–70.023%21 May
dust213–11-0.0413%21 May
inferno11–13-0.065%21 May
cache13–30.115%21 May
cache13–11-0.0413%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.007%29 Apr
mirage7–130.0318%18 Apr
dust213–20.036%18 Apr
dust29–130.0324%17 Apr
dust213–10.0423%17 Apr
vertigo8–130.0422%17 Apr
mirage13–100.0411%5 Mar
overpass11–130.0116%4 Mar
dust213–70.0622%4 Mar
dust26–13-0.0210%28 Feb
overpass13–110.029%27 Feb
nuke7–130.139%26 Feb
mirage7–130.0520%25 Feb
dust210–13-0.0414%25 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0223%25 Feb
inferno13–40.0617%24 Feb
dust213–30.0512%23 Feb
mirage13–60.0124%23 Feb
mirage13–70.1113%22 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0426%21 Feb
overpass5–130.0124%21 Feb
dust212–120.0517%21 Feb
anubis1–13-0.0211%21 Feb
inferno13–70.1013%21 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0713%21 Feb
ancient8–10.0833%21 Feb
mirage13–90.0018%21 Feb
dust213–3-0.0010%21 Feb
inferno13–100.0221%21 Feb
overpass12–120.0921%20 Feb
dust213–30.0218%20 Feb
dust211–130.0513%20 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0212%20 Feb
inferno4–130.0513%19 Feb
mirage13–90.1113%19 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0012%18 Feb
anubis13–10.1810%10 Feb
dust23–13-0.0221%8 Feb
inferno2–130.0027%8 Feb
dust213–10.1219%6 Feb
anubis13–50.068%6 Feb
anubis4–130.0510%5 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0717%5 Feb
ancient13–40.1516%5 Feb
dust27–13-0.0711%5 Feb
ancient15–150.0411%28 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0014%28 Jan
nuke12–12-0.0112%31 Jan
nuke2–80.0510%31 Jan
nuke13–10-0.019%28 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →