Tempt

Tempt — CS2 Stats

ZA76561199021013968[U:1:1060748240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

921Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,675Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,372Purple band · top ~26.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18174 of 29749 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate53.9%44.1%47.2%above
Shot accuracy14.1%11.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.791.031.090.30 short
Match win rate36.8%45.2%46.6%9.8% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTemptPREMIER15,372 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning43
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateWLWWTLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression2.9
Utility5.6
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time635ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–6
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
144In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC36162044%-0.01
dust2B29131645%-0.01
infernoC145936%-0.03
overpassB63350%-0.02
ancientS54180%-0.00
nukeC52340%0.02
anubis31233%-0.05
cache220100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

53,422Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
2,501Matches
36.8%Match win rate
53.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Purple band
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Purple band
5,456MVPs
4,675Hours (in match)
2,611Bombs planted
1,008Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,698
AWP4,046
FAMAS1,458
MP91,122
SSG 081,082

Lifetime map wins

3,926inferno
3,897dust2
2,393vertigo
1,623nuke
1,136train
108lake
22cbble
22safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
633msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
23.9%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.05HE damage / grenade
7.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0030%10 Jun
inferno7–13-0.047%9 Jun
mirage13–80.0819%9 Jun
dust213–110.0016%9 Jun
dust215–150.0319%9 Jun
dust26–13-0.0221%8 Jun
dust213–50.0522%8 Jun
mirage13–00.010%8 Jun
mirage9–130.0416%8 Jun
ancient13–80.0416%8 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0415%8 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0318%8 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0015%7 Jun
dust210–13-0.0131%7 Jun
dust213–110.0129%7 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0723%5 Jun
overpass11–13-0.047%5 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0414%5 Jun
ancient7–10.0243%5 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0211%5 Jun
nuke13–90.0325%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.0821%5 Jun
mirage13–70.0416%3 Jun
overpass13–11-0.009%3 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0021%3 Jun
dust28–13-0.0519%2 Jun
inferno13–90.0438%2 Jun
mirage13–80.0928%2 Jun
mirage6–13-0.049%2 Jun
mirage6–130.0216%2 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0117%1 Jun
inferno13–11-0.056%1 Jun
nuke13–160.0128%31 May
mirage9–13-0.0724%31 May
overpass8–13-0.0220%31 May
dust25–13-0.0034%31 May
dust213–70.0422%31 May
anubis15–15-0.0221%30 May
mirage13–160.0527%30 May
dust29–13-0.0221%29 May
inferno13–6-0.0216%29 May
mirage10–13-0.0417%29 May
anubis1–6-0.050%29 May
mirage9–13-0.0511%29 May
mirage4–13-0.0622%29 May
dust213–11-0.0021%28 May
mirage2–13-0.059%28 May
mirage13–50.0219%28 May
mirage3–13-0.0513%27 May
inferno3–13-0.0721%27 May
inferno5–13-0.0120%27 May
dust24–13-0.118%26 May
dust213–70.0125%26 May
mirage6–13-0.0638%26 May
dust213–7-0.0124%26 May
nuke13–90.0436%18 May
nuke8–13-0.0123%12 May
dust28–13-0.0832%12 May
dust213–10-0.0314%11 May
dust213–11-0.0513%11 May
nuke7–130.0320%11 May
mirage9–130.0222%8 May
inferno2–13-0.0025%8 May
mirage6–13-0.0415%8 May
dust211–13-0.0229%6 May
inferno14–16-0.0611%5 May
mirage13–10-0.0218%4 May
overpass8–130.0424%4 May
dust213–16-0.0419%3 May
mirage16–130.0129%3 May
overpass13–6-0.0618%2 May
inferno7–130.0118%2 May
mirage16–140.0434%2 May
dust213–16-0.0516%2 May
ancient13–8-0.0420%2 May
mirage8–13-0.0017%1 May
dust22–13-0.1220%1 May
cache13–1-0.0532%1 May
dust213–50.0322%30 Apr
mirage15–150.0132%30 Apr
dust213–60.1428%30 Apr
cache13–7-0.0223%30 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0814%30 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0546%21 Feb
mirage13–110.0928%21 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0329%7 Oct
inferno1–13-0.0638%5 Oct
mirage13–3-0.0812%5 Oct
mirage13–11-0.039%3 Oct
dust21–13-0.0740%3 Oct
mirage13–110.0124%3 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0616%2 Oct
dust212–160.0929%1 Oct
dust28–130.0418%1 Oct
overpass13–8-0.0426%29 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0113%29 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0422%29 Sept
dust213–11-0.0619%29 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0726%25 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0411%24 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →