trashJudeSN

trashJudeSN — CS2 Stats

ZA76561199016519401[U:1:1056253673]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,797Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
6,199Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,454Purple band · top ~10.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3923 of 7954 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate48.6%48.1%meets
Shot accuracy13.3%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.801.080.28 short
Match win rate26.5%46.5%20.0% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtrashJudeSNPREMIER19,454 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56404Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression5.6
Utility5.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time654ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–4
132Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A44251957%0.00
mirageA1911858%-0.02
nukeS128467%0.01
anubisS118373%0.01
infernoD51420%-0.02
ancient41325%0.02
cache2020%-0.04
vertigo220100%0.00
overpass1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

336,556Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
18,351Matches
26.5%Match win rate
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
13,924MVPs
4,684Hours (in match)
2,518Bombs planted
1,282Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47121,342
AWP55,494
SSG 0819,141
MP94,373

Lifetime map wins

53,394dust2
2,614vertigo
2,219nuke
1,590inferno
232train
74ar_shoots
72lake
59bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
655msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
4.71HE damage / grenade
17.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.792% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.012%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0218%16 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0412%16 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0131%14 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0816%14 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0315%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0535%14 Aug
dust213–60.0818%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0525%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0325%13 Aug
dust213–6-0.0236%13 Aug
dust213–4-0.0014%13 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0319%13 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0216%13 Aug
dust213–16-0.0420%13 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0216%13 Aug
dust213–50.0016%2 Jun
dust23–13-0.0810%2 Jun
ancient5–130.0419%2 Jun
cache4–13-0.0319%27 May
anubis13–110.1017%27 May
mirage13–4-0.0412%27 May
anubis13–50.0322%27 May
dust213–11-0.0126%25 May
nuke9–13-0.0422%25 May
mirage13–2-0.0313%25 May
mirage13–8-0.0518%25 May
dust26–13-0.0510%24 May
dust26–130.0817%24 May
nuke13–70.0028%21 May
anubis13–8-0.0420%21 May
dust213–110.0013%21 May
dust211–13-0.0622%21 May
inferno10–130.0124%20 May
dust28–13-0.0334%20 May
dust213–20.0831%20 May
inferno13–80.0318%19 May
dust27–13-0.0324%19 May
ancient13–2-0.0029%19 May
nuke11–130.0127%19 May
nuke16–130.0320%18 May
mirage5–13-0.0118%18 May
dust213–4-0.0219%18 May
dust213–50.0316%18 May
nuke12–120.0630%17 May
dust213–80.0129%17 May
cache7–13-0.0616%17 May
mirage3–13-0.0325%17 May
dust213–90.0626%17 May
dust213–110.0132%17 May
dust212–120.0612%15 May
dust213–7-0.0020%15 May
anubis3–13-0.0315%15 May
dust24–13-0.0820%14 May
dust213–110.1221%14 May
ancient7–130.0220%14 May
dust211–130.0118%14 May
dust215–150.0422%4 Apr
dust213–4-0.0319%27 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0621%27 Feb
anubis13–60.0521%27 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0511%27 Feb
dust213–5-0.0115%24 Feb
dust210–13-0.0332%24 Feb
mirage5–130.0322%24 Feb
ancient5–130.0113%18 Feb
vertigo13–50.0213%17 Feb
inferno7–13-0.039%17 Feb
dust213–40.0429%17 Feb
anubis13–80.0219%16 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0233%16 Feb
anubis13–30.0518%15 Feb
anubis11–130.0122%15 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0520%15 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0215%15 Feb
overpass4–130.0017%15 Feb
vertigo13–2-0.0227%15 Feb
anubis13–5-0.0113%15 Feb
dust28–13-0.0515%14 Feb
dust26–13-0.015%14 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0313%14 Feb
nuke16–120.037%14 Feb
dust28–13-0.0815%14 Feb
mirage13–90.0516%1 Feb
dust213–60.0536%1 Feb
dust213–70.1126%31 Jan
mirage4–130.0115%31 Jan
nuke11–130.0311%31 Jan
mirage13–70.046%31 Jan
dust29–13-0.0440%31 Jan
dust213–40.1324%30 Jan
dust215–15-0.0625%30 Jan
dust213–6-0.0018%30 Jan
dust24–13-0.089%30 Jan
dust213–8-0.0515%29 Jan
mirage13–40.0338%29 Jan
dust213–50.0031%29 Jan
dust213–50.0417%29 Jan
nuke13–20.0712%29 Jan
mirage13–50.0317%28 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →