Welle — CS2 Stats

76561199015875266[U:1:1055609538]

603Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
538Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 Solid
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate51.0%44.9%46.2%above
Shot accuracy6.3%11.8%12.5%6.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.041.060.15 short
Match win rate46.4%45.3%45.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWelleFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning52
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression6.1
Utility5.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch6.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time579ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — cache 13–4
131Biggest win — overpass
5Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2171433%-0.02
mirageA2011955%-0.01
ancientC146843%0.00
cacheA95456%0.01
nukeC94544%-0.04
anubisD81713%-0.04
overpassA85363%-0.03
dust2C73443%-0.03
train21150%-0.01
office110100%-0.00
italy110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,105Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
1,437Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
51.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
6.3%Shot accuracy
2,706MVPs
538Hours (in match)
1,658Bombs planted
247Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,528inferno
1,506dust2
996nuke
831vertigo
281train
32office
30italy
17lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches
52%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
72.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1471%1.2314.1
Dust2850%0.9516.1
Ancient650%0.9212.7
Inferno6100%0.9515.0
Anubis650%1.5513.0
Vertigo540%0.8714.0
Nuke367%0.8510.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
587msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.62HE damage / grenade
7.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6818% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7362% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0410%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0612%21 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0320%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0310%20 Jul
cache13–110.0414%20 Jul
cache13–9-0.0015%28 May
mirage9–130.0317%28 May
mirage16–140.0124%28 May
ancient13–7-0.0414%28 May
inferno13–5-0.019%28 May
cache6–130.0121%14 May
cache13–40.0921%14 May
cache12–120.026%14 May
cache13–5-0.0213%14 May
cache10–13-0.0711%14 May
cache8–13-0.0110%13 May
cache13–80.0119%13 May
dust213–6-0.0213%19 Feb
inferno13–80.0417%2 Feb
anubis5–13-0.1215%2 Feb
overpass13–5-0.0817%1 Feb
mirage13–80.0621%1 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0414%27 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0426%27 Jan
dust213–6-0.0116%27 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0710%27 Jan
nuke13–5-0.0222%26 Jan
ancient13–7-0.077%26 Jan
inferno13–4-0.048%26 Jan
mirage16–12-0.058%26 Jan
ancient13–70.0715%26 Jan
anubis12–16-0.057%26 Jan
overpass13–10.009%23 Jan
anubis4–13-0.065%23 Jan
dust215–15-0.0312%22 Jan
anubis4–13-0.0716%22 Jan
office13–4-0.0031%21 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0317%21 Jan
anubis13–60.0116%21 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0124%21 Jan
nuke13–100.0424%14 Jan
overpass13–80.0014%14 Jan
ancient4–130.0715%14 Jan
inferno13–110.0116%14 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0013%11 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0116%4 Jan
mirage13–50.0113%4 Jan
dust27–13-0.073%4 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0314%3 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0113%3 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0416%3 Jan
train9–13-0.0310%3 Jan
mirage16–140.0010%3 Jan
ancient8–130.0215%2 Jan
inferno11–130.0220%2 Jan
inferno9–130.0412%28 Dec
train13–60.0110%28 Dec
dust213–100.0214%28 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0021%28 Dec
ancient13–100.0111%28 Dec
nuke5–13-0.120%28 Dec
overpass8–13-0.0613%28 Dec
dust22–13-0.097%28 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0225%28 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0213%28 Dec
ancient7–130.0220%28 Dec
mirage13–110.0319%28 Dec
inferno6–130.0126%27 Dec
dust23–13-0.0214%5 Dec
italy13–4-0.0228%5 Dec
overpass14–16-0.0114%5 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0418%5 Dec
overpass13–40.0116%5 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0225%23 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0933%22 Nov
nuke13–11-0.0622%18 Nov
mirage14–16-0.0118%31 Oct
inferno13–60.0516%31 Oct
ancient16–130.019%31 Oct
mirage5–13-0.0018%31 Oct
inferno7–13-0.1031%30 Oct
mirage11–13-0.046%11 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0613%11 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0315%29 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0523%26 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0516%19 Jun
mirage13–40.0728%19 Jun
anubis7–130.0216%19 Jun
nuke11–13-0.077%11 Jun
ancient13–70.0116%11 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0021%11 Jun
anubis8–130.0019%11 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0815%6 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0530%6 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0215%6 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0318%15 May
nuke9–130.0115%14 May
mirage13–40.0012%16 Apr
ancient5–130.0213%15 Apr
ancient2–13-0.067%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →