synx

synx — CS2 Stats

76561199014240063[U:1:1053974335]Steam profile ↗

312Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
194Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate53.3%42.5%44.2%above
Shot accuracy2.2%10.9%11.2%9.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.810.991.040.23 short
Match win rate34.3%44.2%45.3%11.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsynxFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning50
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46495Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2
Aggression7.3
Utility4.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 681ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning5.0
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time688ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 742ms → last ⅓ avg 688ms
Headshot accuracy26.2%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 9–0
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
L11Current streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 18ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24111346%-0.00
nukeB23111248%0.01
mirageA1810856%0.02
dust2B168850%-0.01
ancientD62433%0.03
train42250%-0.01
overpass42250%-0.04
office2020%0.02
vertigo2020%-0.04
anubis1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

6,391Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
498Matches
34.3%Match win rate
53.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
2.2%Shot accuracy
987MVPs
194Hours (in match)
526Bombs planted
90Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

857nuke
711dust2
513inferno
163vertigo
55office
37train
2assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches
0%Win rate
0.31Avg K/D
ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy
27.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
22.8%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
681msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
5.50HE damage / grenade
12.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2535% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–130.0141%8 Feb
dust25–13-0.0825%22 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0325%21 Jan
mirage0–13-0.0814%20 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0145%17 Jan
inferno4–8-0.0925%16 Jan
inferno5–90.0534%16 Jan
train2–13-0.0724%13 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0021%11 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0722%10 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0728%8 Jan
inferno13–90.0219%8 Jan
mirage10–130.0828%7 Jan
mirage13–30.1424%6 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0919%6 Jan
mirage13–110.0531%5 Jan
inferno9–40.1032%5 Jan
mirage16–140.0229%5 Jan
dust211–13-0.0719%4 Jan
dust213–50.0524%30 Dec
nuke13–90.0131%26 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0323%25 Dec
dust27–13-0.0621%25 Dec
inferno9–50.0121%25 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0727%25 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0732%23 Dec
nuke4–13-0.0227%23 Dec
inferno10–13-0.0330%20 Dec
train13–100.0614%9 Dec
dust212–4-0.0424%30 Nov
office6–13-0.0426%28 Nov
ancient13–50.1330%28 Nov
nuke3–130.0529%28 Nov
mirage13–40.0323%28 Nov
mirage3–13-0.0215%27 Nov
ancient7–13-0.0121%25 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0523%21 Nov
nuke10–13-0.0130%21 Nov
inferno5–9-0.0325%18 Nov
inferno13–8-0.0222%17 Nov
mirage14–160.1228%16 Nov
nuke13–50.0716%16 Nov
mirage2–13-0.0328%16 Nov
nuke13–6-0.0616%15 Nov
nuke13–60.0435%15 Nov
overpass13–9-0.0718%15 Nov
train13–60.0330%15 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0123%15 Nov
overpass5–13-0.0430%15 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0521%15 Nov
mirage14–16-0.0118%14 Nov
ancient6–130.0523%14 Nov
mirage13–5-0.0213%13 Nov
nuke13–20.0730%13 Nov
overpass13–110.0320%30 Oct
nuke12–50.0436%30 Oct
inferno6–9-0.1329%30 Oct
dust24–13-0.0234%28 Oct
train9–13-0.0522%27 Oct
dust25–13-0.0215%26 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0615%18 Feb
inferno4–9-0.0612%16 Feb
dust213–70.0721%16 Feb
ancient16–140.0414%16 Feb
dust28–13-0.0316%15 Feb
inferno9–7-0.0228%15 Feb
dust26–13-0.0515%14 Feb
dust213–60.1027%13 Feb
dust212–12-0.0129%11 Feb
nuke13–110.0225%6 Feb
ancient8–130.0315%6 Feb
nuke10–50.0721%6 Feb
dust213–8-0.0226%5 Feb
vertigo5–9-0.0228%5 Jan
nuke7–9-0.0023%5 Jan
inferno3–8-0.0321%5 Jan
mirage6–130.0923%31 Dec
mirage13–110.0521%31 Dec
inferno9–30.1233%31 Dec
nuke8–80.0613%31 Dec
overpass8–8-0.0726%30 Dec
inferno9–00.1754%30 Dec
inferno6–9-0.1712%29 Dec
inferno9–70.0413%29 Dec
inferno9–20.0619%29 Dec
inferno9–20.0834%29 Dec
nuke13–70.1129%29 Dec
inferno13–110.0331%29 Dec
nuke6–130.0615%29 Dec
office7–130.0712%29 Dec
dust213–70.0311%25 Dec
mirage13–5-0.0412%2 Dec
nuke13–50.1017%25 Nov
dust213–9-0.0620%25 Nov
dust213–70.1124%24 Nov
inferno8–8-0.0914%18 Nov
nuke9–70.0018%18 Nov
nuke8–8-0.1319%18 Nov
mirage13–110.1219%17 Nov
vertigo6–13-0.0518%17 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →