Breezey — CS2 Stats

US76561199009300162[U:1:1049034434]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,861Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,101Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4002 of 12182 tracked

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning60

Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression9.7

Utility3.3

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning6.0

Utility3.3

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time635ms+20ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms

Headshot accuracy39.6%+7.5%

first ⅓ avg 32.1% → last ⅓ avg 39.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — office 13–4

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

2–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 58% over 12cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	16	9–7	56%	0.06
dust2	C	16	7–9	44%	0.02
office	A	12	7–5	58%	0.09
vertigo	C	11	4–7	36%	0.02
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.07
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	0.05
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	0.05
warden	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04
mirage	—	4	3–1	75%	0.05
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
train	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
italy	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
stronghold	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches

60%Win rate

1.43Avg K/D

106.4ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

46%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	7	57%	1.75	21.6
Mirage	5	60%	1.13	18.8
Overpass	4	25%	1.10	23.3
Nuke	4	25%	1.35	24.3
Vertigo	3	67%	1.37	23.7
Inferno	3	67%	1.91	28.7
Ancient	2	50%	2.06	21.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.56	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

38.4%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.5%Spray accuracy

85.8%Counter-strafing

11.4°Preaim

623msReaction time

46.6%T opening success

45.8%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

13.9%Flash assists

10.13HE damage / grenade

1.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4313 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	10–13	0.07	39%	24 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	37%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	16%	23 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.01	30%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.04	25%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–1	-0.03	100%	21 Jul →
train	11–13	0.00	34%	21 Jul →
shelter	8–13	0.05	26%	20 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	31%	20 Jul →
vertigo	1–13	-0.05	100%	20 Jul →
office	11–13	-0.04	36%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.11	41%	7 Jul →
vertigo	3–9	-0.19	38%	5 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.13	26%	3 Jul →
office	10–13	0.08	25%	2 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	-0.04	30%	2 Jul →
overpass	9–4	0.14	35%	2 Jul →
sanctum	3–9	-0.05	33%	2 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.09	59%	2 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.15	26%	2 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	0.15	40%	2 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	59%	2 Jul →
office	13–4	0.19	48%	2 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.01	48%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	38%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.10	40%	30 Jun →
vertigo	2–13	0.01	34%	30 Jun →
inferno	9–6	0.10	16%	30 Jun →
office	13–7	0.10	47%	29 Jun →
warden	12–12	0.02	24%	28 Jun →
office	13–3	0.14	68%	27 Jun →
warden	13–4	0.07	39%	27 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	21%	27 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	28%	26 Jun →
office	7–13	0.05	43%	26 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	25%	23 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.01	32%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	28%	23 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.01	48%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	26%	23 Jun →
italy	13–10	0.06	22%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.09	25%	22 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	42%	22 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.03	38%	22 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.00	21%	22 Jun →
warden	2–13	0.07	50%	21 Jun →
office	13–3	0.17	77%	21 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.03	37%	21 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.17	40%	21 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.00	27%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.12	30%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.19	27%	21 Jun →
dust2	16–13	-0.01	21%	19 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	34%	19 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.06	23%	19 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.03	31%	18 Jun →
office	7–13	0.01	20%	18 Jun →
overpass	15–19	0.01	23%	18 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.02	21%	16 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	23%	16 Jun →
stronghold	13–10	0.07	32%	16 Jun →
vertigo	13–4	0.09	40%	16 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	-0.01	33%	16 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	25%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.10	41%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.08	40%	15 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.08	25%	15 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.03	28%	15 Jun →
overpass	17–19	0.00	28%	14 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.11	37%	14 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.03	23%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.17	36%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.13	32%	11 Jun →
office	13–6	0.10	25%	11 Jun →
warden	13–4	0.01	24%	11 Jun →
italy	13–6	0.01	13%	10 Jun →
vertigo	11–13	0.08	28%	10 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.00	30%	10 Jun →
train	13–11	0.01	30%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.14	41%	9 Jun →
italy	5–13	-0.02	38%	9 Jun →
inferno	5–13	0.03	48%	9 Jun →
overpass	1–13	-0.02	9%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.09	22%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.02	31%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	34%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.10	43%	8 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.02	20%	8 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.08	25%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.14	29%	8 Jun →
vertigo	9–6	0.13	50%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.04	40%	7 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.05	40%	7 Jun →
inferno	4–13	0.00	28%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.11	35%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	17%	7 Jun →
office	13–7	0.11	58%	7 Jun →
train	12–12	0.03	43%	7 Jun →
office	1–13	0.05	52%	6 Jun →
office	8–1	0.07	23%	6 Jun →