Berre8891

Berre8891 — CS2 Stats

76561199008979623[U:1:1048713895]Steam profile ↗

187Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
726Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBerre8891FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning37
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4852Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression1.4
Utility4.3
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 32% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning3.7
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time626ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 10–13
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cache_bBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC45202544%-0.01
ancientC104640%-0.01
nukeC104640%-0.00
vertigoS107370%-0.02
dust2D62433%-0.02
anubisB63350%-0.01
cache_bS54180%-0.01
overpass43175%-0.00
inferno31233%-0.01
train1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,971Lifetime kills
1.80K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
654Matches
43.4%Match win rate
62.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of tracked players
10.9%Shot accuracy
1,448MVPs
726Hours (in match)
723Bombs planted
178Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

803inferno
753vertigo
706dust2
330nuke
86office
86cbble
58train
41lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
48%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
74.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient729%0.9415.7
Mirage560%1.0616.0
Dust2250%0.689.5
Nuke10%0.368.0
Anubis1100%0.8916.0
Inferno10%0.478.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
621msReaction time
13.6%T opening success
32.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
6.79HE damage / grenade
6.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.6215% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0211%2 Jan
ancient13–20.0428%2 Jan
mirage13–4-0.018%2 Jan
ancient2–13-0.098%1 Jan
overpass13–7-0.0311%26 Dec
dust211–13-0.0430%26 Dec
nuke8–130.0126%26 Dec
dust213–160.0411%20 Dec
mirage13–10.0411%20 Dec
ancient13–16-0.038%19 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0115%19 Dec
mirage9–2-0.057%19 Dec
inferno16–13-0.0018%19 Dec
mirage10–130.0128%19 Dec
mirage13–00.0641%19 Dec
ancient13–16-0.0021%18 Dec
anubis13–8-0.0313%18 Dec
mirage6–130.0116%17 Dec
nuke8–130.0214%17 Dec
mirage13–3-0.0520%17 Dec
mirage9–13-0.038%12 Dec
mirage2–13-0.077%12 Dec
nuke13–60.0416%12 Dec
mirage14–160.008%10 Dec
nuke13–11-0.0017%9 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0619%9 Dec
vertigo13–3-0.055%8 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0215%8 Dec
cache_b13–9-0.0221%7 Dec
vertigo12–16-0.0416%7 Dec
inferno13–160.0111%7 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0216%6 Dec
anubis13–8-0.0424%6 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0417%6 Dec
nuke8–130.0025%6 Dec
mirage16–120.0013%6 Dec
dust24–10-0.0511%5 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0423%5 Dec
mirage13–6-0.0618%5 Dec
mirage15–19-0.0415%5 Dec
cache_b12–16-0.0210%3 Dec
nuke13–100.0220%2 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0117%2 Dec
anubis12–160.0016%2 Dec
mirage6–12-0.056%2 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0113%2 Dec
mirage13–30.1116%2 Dec
ancient13–7-0.0210%2 Dec
dust210–13-0.0718%1 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0710%30 Nov
cache_b13–5-0.0420%30 Nov
mirage13–90.0413%30 Nov
mirage13–70.0030%30 Nov
overpass13–100.0324%30 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0319%27 Nov
anubis7–130.0413%27 Nov
mirage13–16-0.0816%27 Nov
mirage13–6-0.0313%27 Nov
nuke12–16-0.0715%27 Nov
train2–13-0.0317%26 Nov
cache_b13–7-0.0328%26 Nov
nuke13–110.027%26 Nov
anubis13–50.0418%26 Nov
cache_b13–40.0825%25 Nov
mirage13–6-0.0111%25 Nov
vertigo6–13-0.0321%25 Nov
mirage5–100.0313%25 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0925%25 Nov
vertigo13–11-0.0012%25 Nov
anubis11–13-0.0510%25 Nov
ancient13–60.0720%25 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0217%24 Nov
vertigo13–90.0614%24 Nov
mirage13–100.0029%24 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0520%23 Nov
mirage17–19-0.0610%23 Nov
mirage11–130.0511%22 Nov
mirage13–40.0412%22 Nov
mirage8–13-0.049%19 Nov
vertigo13–40.019%19 Nov
vertigo13–9-0.0513%19 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0618%18 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0015%18 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0215%18 Nov
mirage13–50.0119%18 Nov
ancient9–13-0.049%18 Nov
mirage2–13-0.089%17 Nov
ancient13–100.0412%17 Nov
mirage11–130.0225%17 Nov
overpass11–130.0315%17 Nov
vertigo10–13-0.038%16 Nov
vertigo13–10-0.0510%16 Nov
dust213–110.0210%15 Nov
dust213–6-0.0121%15 Nov
mirage1–8-0.1122%14 Nov
mirage13–80.015%14 Nov
mirage6–13-0.0210%13 Nov
mirage10–130.1413%12 Nov
vertigo13–10-0.023%12 Nov
mirage13–16-0.019%12 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →