mprg — CS2 Stats

76561199002120932[U:1:1041855204]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

593Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.8 Learning

Premier CS Rating11,466Blue band · top ~47.1% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44

Positioning48

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateTTLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4

Aggression6.6

Utility4.9

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4

Positioning4.8

Utility4.9

Mechanics4.3

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time591ms−8ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms

Headshot accuracy19.7%+2.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–1Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 22% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	30	11–19	37%	-0.01
dust2	D	19	5–14	26%	-0.01
nuke	D	18	4–14	22%	-0.01
anubis	S	11	8–3	73%	0.02
inferno	S	9	7–2	78%	0.03
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches

62%Win rate

0.79Avg K/D

70.9ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy

28.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.3%Spray accuracy

69.5%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

592msReaction time

33.1%T opening success

50.7%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

8.17HE damage / grenade

10.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4243 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.1394% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	15–15	0.02	16%	30 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	13%	30 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	12%	30 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	8%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.08	23%	29 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	22%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	32%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	9%	28 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	17%	9 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	8%	7 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	23%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	28%	3 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	15%	3 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	12%	3 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.00	11%	2 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.08	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.17	26%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	21%	1 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	22%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.00	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	25%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	26%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	17%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.00	19%	24 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	25%	24 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	16%	24 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	20%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.13	28%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	16%	23 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.06	11%	23 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.01	19%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.05	17%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	16%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.00	15%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	30%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.08	15%	22 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	21%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.13	22%	20 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	14%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	7%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.09	19%	20 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.04	18%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	1–7	-0.08	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	14%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.00	28%	19 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.05	18%	3 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	14%	3 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	17%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	20%	2 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.05	15%	2 Jul →
poseidon	5–9	-0.02	12%	2 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	11%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	17%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.06	11%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	23%	27 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.11	38%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	8%	26 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	22%	26 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	18%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.03	18%	26 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	24%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	12%	25 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	10%	25 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.01	11%	7 Jun →
nuke	3–13	0.01	14%	7 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	16%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	22%	6 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	32%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.03	15%	6 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	6%	6 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	19%	6 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	10%	5 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	20%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	15%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.04	22%	5 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.03	18%	5 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	-0.03	22%	3 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.08	16%	26 May →
dust2	11–13	0.02	20%	25 May →
nuke	13–10	0.01	13%	25 May →
anubis	13–3	0.06	20%	25 May →
mirage	9–13	0.06	20%	25 May →
overpass	13–5	-0.05	16%	25 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	15%	25 May →
mirage	13–9	0.03	10%	25 May →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	14%	24 May →
ancient	10–13	0.02	20%	24 May →
nuke	3–11	0.04	43%	23 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	15%	23 May →
anubis	9–1	0.01	3%	23 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	12%	23 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	17%	23 May →
anubis	7–13	0.07	27%	16 May →
mirage	12–16	-0.00	17%	16 May →