spy ⁧⁧ who edges at ledges

spy ⁧⁧ who edges at ledges — CS2 Stats

US76561198992543547[U:1:1032277819]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,308Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,502Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate45.7%42.2%42.7%above
Shot accuracy15.3%11.9%10.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.140.981.00above
Match win rate36.1%43.6%44.1%8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGspy ⁧⁧ who edges at ledgesFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning50
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateTWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression5.1
Utility7.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.0
Utility7.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time659ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — ancient 13–2
132Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2920969%0.01
mirageB179853%0.01
nukeC1661038%0.03
infernoS107370%0.01
overpassB84450%0.02
trainB63350%0.03
ancientB63350%0.02
vertigo31233%0.00
anubis31233%0.04
office21150%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,592Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
3,709Matches
36.1%Match win rate
45.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
6,475MVPs
1,502Hours (in match)
3,114Bombs planted
738Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,844
AWP7,545
SSG 087,404
Knife1,648
FAMAS1,201

Lifetime map wins

14,369dust2
4,163nuke
1,524inferno
591train
317vertigo
63office
29safehouse
25lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
668msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
11.62HE damage / grenade
10.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5656% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass15–150.059%29 Jan
dust213–50.1118%18 Jan
dust213–50.0510%18 Jan
mirage13–100.0219%18 Jan
train8–130.0319%3 Jan
overpass7–130.057%28 Dec
overpass16–120.0510%25 Dec
dust216–140.0414%24 Dec
dust25–130.0124%24 Dec
dust27–13-0.0120%24 Dec
dust212–12-0.0119%24 Dec
dust24–20.0450%24 Dec
dust213–11-0.0112%24 Dec
dust24–13-0.0425%24 Dec
dust213–4-0.0141%23 Dec
inferno13–110.0213%23 Dec
inferno7–13-0.0218%23 Dec
nuke5–130.0323%23 Dec
nuke4–130.0119%23 Dec
overpass13–8-0.019%21 Dec
train7–130.0411%21 Dec
dust26–13-0.0520%21 Dec
dust213–30.0117%21 Dec
inferno13–60.0141%21 Dec
mirage13–20.0510%20 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0112%20 Dec
dust213–80.0219%20 Dec
nuke13–70.1012%20 Dec
vertigo13–110.0222%20 Dec
vertigo12–120.0124%20 Dec
vertigo3–13-0.0214%19 Dec
overpass13–30.068%15 Dec
dust28–13-0.0122%15 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0313%15 Dec
overpass13–80.0516%15 Dec
overpass14–16-0.0212%15 Dec
mirage9–130.058%14 Dec
dust28–130.0214%13 Dec
dust213–40.0122%13 Dec
nuke13–80.0313%13 Dec
dust213–90.039%12 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0313%12 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0418%11 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0813%11 Dec
inferno8–130.0011%10 Dec
nuke13–100.0316%10 Dec
nuke10–130.0418%10 Dec
ancient7–6-0.0412%10 Dec
dust216–13-0.0224%10 Dec
anubis13–40.0422%10 Dec
anubis5–130.0419%10 Dec
anubis7–130.0316%10 Dec
ancient13–20.2344%9 Dec
ancient13–60.0413%9 Dec
inferno13–100.0513%7 Dec
inferno13–110.0729%7 Dec
nuke13–70.0811%7 Dec
train13–70.0616%5 Dec
dust213–110.0218%5 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0831%5 Dec
nuke12–12-0.0026%4 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0321%4 Dec
dust213–80.009%3 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0514%1 Dec
mirage13–40.0824%1 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0126%1 Dec
nuke9–130.0015%1 Dec
ancient13–5-0.0214%1 Dec
mirage16–120.0321%1 Dec
dust29–13-0.0216%1 Dec
train13–100.0613%1 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0316%30 Nov
dust213–11-0.0323%30 Nov
dust213–11-0.0125%30 Nov
mirage13–90.0614%30 Nov
inferno5–130.0112%30 Nov
overpass8–13-0.0519%30 Nov
dust213–100.0610%30 Nov
inferno13–5-0.0025%30 Nov
nuke13–80.0013%29 Nov
nuke10–13-0.0312%29 Nov
nuke13–20.2015%29 Nov
mirage11–130.0323%29 Nov
dust213–80.0123%29 Nov
train5–13-0.1022%29 Nov
dust213–60.0226%28 Nov
office7–130.1216%28 Nov
office13–110.0826%28 Nov
mirage15–150.0014%28 Nov
nuke15–150.0513%27 Nov
inferno13–50.0118%22 Nov
nuke11–130.0414%22 Nov
train13–90.0620%22 Nov
dust216–14-0.0117%21 Nov
mirage13–100.0115%21 Nov
dust26–130.0316%21 Nov
dust213–20.028%20 Nov
mirage13–20.0916%20 Nov
mirage7–130.0613%20 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0614%20 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →