Xenz.

Xenz. — CS2 Stats

JP76561198987632045[U:1:1027366317]Steam profile ↗

663Tracked matches73%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,351Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5218 of 50563 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 948 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXenz.FACEITLevel 6 · 948 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER25,351 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning54
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61372Last 10061%Win rateWWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression6.3
Utility4.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms+92ms
first ⅓ avg 487ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 13–4
130Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
W8Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS34221265%0.02
dust2A32201263%0.02
anubisB115645%-0.01
infernoB105550%0.03
nukeS76186%0.01
ancient43175%0.05
cache2020%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

172Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
66.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6860%1.0714.1
Dust24048%0.9612.3
Anubis2143%0.9814.4
Ancient1759%1.1616.5
Inferno1553%1.0714.5
Nuke729%0.6310.0
Cache250%0.9617.5
Train10%0.6911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
570msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.59HE damage / grenade
11.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3767 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0077% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.0416%29 Aug
inferno13–50.0716%28 Aug
inferno9–10.1160%26 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0519%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0231%25 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0326%25 Aug
dust213–50.0311%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0416%25 Aug
dust29–130.0024%25 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0243%24 Aug
mirage13–40.1931%24 Aug
anubis11–13-0.019%24 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0315%24 Aug
dust213–10.1521%24 Aug
mirage13–90.0324%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0323%23 Aug
dust216–140.0212%23 Aug
mirage13–30.0223%23 Aug
dust213–3-0.050%23 Aug
anubis13–160.0017%23 Aug
mirage13–30.0013%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0321%22 Aug
anubis4–9-0.027%20 Aug
dust213–80.0117%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0334%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0224%18 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0216%18 Aug
anubis13–40.0523%17 Aug
dust213–9-0.0220%17 Aug
dust213–9-0.0321%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0223%15 Aug
dust213–30.0350%15 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0120%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0320%14 Aug
dust213–11-0.0524%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0621%12 Aug
mirage4–130.0711%12 Aug
dust213–11-0.0115%12 Aug
anubis13–110.0115%11 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0420%11 Aug
mirage13–80.0612%10 Aug
dust213–100.0025%10 Aug
anubis9–130.0315%10 Aug
anubis13–3-0.058%10 Aug
dust213–30.1331%9 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0250%9 Aug
dust213–90.1620%9 Aug
mirage9–130.1112%9 Aug
ancient6–130.1020%9 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0335%6 Aug
dust22–13-0.0633%6 Aug
inferno13–110.0725%5 Aug
dust213–60.1025%5 Aug
nuke4–130.0020%5 Aug
ancient13–100.025%4 Aug
mirage13–110.1123%4 Aug
inferno2–130.0943%4 Aug
dust20–130.000%4 Aug
anubis1–13-0.050%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0215%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0538%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0514%4 Aug
dust211–130.0111%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0220%3 Aug
cache15–150.0522%30 Jul
dust213–80.0517%30 Jul
mirage0–130.0967%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0011%30 Jul
mirage15–150.0417%29 Jul
mirage16–130.0711%29 Jul
dust213–50.069%29 Jul
mirage13–80.0428%27 Jul
nuke13–00.010%27 Jul
ancient13–00.0129%27 Jul
dust213–00.0022%27 Jul
nuke13–00.0238%27 Jul
inferno13–50.055%27 Jul
dust28–130.0316%27 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0725%27 Jul
ancient13–50.0413%27 Jul
dust29–13-0.0434%27 Jul
cache10–130.0718%26 Jul
nuke13–0-0.030%26 Jul
dust213–30.115%26 Jul
anubis13–90.0210%26 Jul
dust213–60.0645%24 Jul
mirage0–13-0.050%24 Jul
dust27–130.0120%24 Jul
anubis13–70.009%19 Jul
dust214–160.0513%19 Jul
inferno4–130.0015%19 Jul
nuke7–20.1124%19 Jul
mirage5–130.0128%18 Jul
mirage13–0-0.000%18 Jul
mirage5–130.0624%18 Jul
inferno14–160.0724%18 Jul
nuke13–00.000%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0216%18 Jul
dust214–16-0.0212%17 Jul
mirage13–50.0430%17 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →