Tăbă

Tăbă — CS2 Stats

RO76561198986890690[U:1:1026624962]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

438Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,696Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,102 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate69.4%46.1%47.0%above
Shot accuracy6.5%12.6%12.7%6.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.311.051.07above
Match win rate40.3%45.7%46.4%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTăbăFACEITLevel 7 · 1,102 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning39
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5842Last 10058%Win rateWLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression3.5
Utility5.9
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning3.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time580ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+6.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–9
130Biggest win — dust2
14Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 19anubisWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31191261%-0.01
dust2A29161355%0.01
ancientA1912763%-0.00
infernoA127558%0.01
anubisB63350%0.03
cache110100%0.01
overpass1010%-0.04
nuke1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,829Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
1,838Matches
40.3%Match win rate
69.4%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 7 players
6.5%Shot accuracy
3,836MVPs
1,007Hours (in match)
1,736Bombs planted
450Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,244dust2
3,994inferno
766nuke
305vertigo
170train
28office
2cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

577Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
76.2ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15748%1.0715.4
Dust211556%1.0113.9
Inferno7152%1.2216.6
Ancient7047%0.9515.3
Anubis5549%1.0215.8
Nuke1856%1.1916.8
Vertigo1136%1.0013.0
Train50%0.7010.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
584msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
29.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
8.14HE damage / grenade
15.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2314% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0128%30 Aug
mirage0–3-0.06100%30 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0522%23 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0533%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0516%8 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0324%8 Aug
dust213–110.0526%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0015%23 Jul
ancient13–100.0118%22 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0325%22 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0231%22 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0417%22 Jul
dust24–13-0.0233%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.047%21 Jul
anubis9–130.0718%21 Jul
mirage13–30.1132%13 Jul
dust211–13-0.0220%13 Jul
mirage13–40.0032%12 Jul
mirage13–40.0227%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0126%23 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0314%11 Jun
mirage14–160.0422%7 Jun
dust213–90.0912%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0529%21 May
mirage8–130.0315%21 May
ancient19–17-0.0029%17 May
dust213–20.0821%17 May
dust210–130.0330%17 May
dust29–13-0.0122%17 May
inferno8–13-0.0324%17 May
dust213–11-0.0616%17 May
dust29–13-0.0226%14 May
mirage13–10.0513%12 May
mirage6–13-0.0829%12 May
ancient13–9-0.0111%12 May
cache13–90.0111%29 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0217%27 Apr
dust213–90.0623%27 Apr
anubis13–40.1230%23 Apr
dust213–60.0517%23 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0421%23 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0416%22 Apr
inferno13–40.0326%22 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0024%20 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0017%20 Apr
dust211–13-0.099%20 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0532%19 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0314%19 Apr
dust29–13-0.0818%19 Apr
mirage13–8-0.019%19 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0111%19 Apr
dust213–16-0.0130%19 Apr
dust213–100.0223%19 Apr
inferno4–130.0028%13 Apr
dust211–130.0123%13 Apr
inferno13–110.0116%11 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0215%11 Apr
dust213–9-0.0016%11 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0120%11 Apr
mirage13–90.0119%11 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0417%9 Apr
anubis13–100.0030%9 Apr
ancient13–70.0514%9 Apr
inferno13–90.0315%8 Apr
ancient13–100.0733%5 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0018%5 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0320%4 Apr
dust213–50.0122%4 Apr
mirage16–140.0519%4 Apr
dust211–13-0.0324%4 Apr
dust210–130.0712%3 Apr
inferno13–90.1616%3 Apr
inferno11–130.0210%31 Mar
ancient8–130.0116%31 Mar
ancient19–16-0.0116%29 Mar
dust214–16-0.0621%29 Mar
overpass5–13-0.040%27 Mar
dust213–20.1122%24 Mar
dust213–110.0311%24 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0517%22 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0120%22 Mar
mirage13–80.0219%22 Mar
dust213–30.0716%22 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0614%22 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0512%22 Mar
dust24–13-0.0329%22 Mar
dust213–40.0226%22 Mar
dust213–90.0223%21 Mar
dust213–2-0.0021%21 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0421%21 Mar
inferno13–30.0628%21 Mar
dust213–00.0322%21 Mar
mirage13–160.0518%20 Mar
ancient13–50.0911%16 Mar
ancient13–30.039%14 Mar
mirage4–13-0.1220%12 Mar
anubis8–130.0520%12 Mar
ancient11–40.0135%12 Mar
ancient13–90.0121%9 Mar
mirage13–100.009%8 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches14-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →