vivazz — CS2 Stats
JP76561198963365647[U:1:1003099919]Steam profile ↗VAC banned
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 43.4% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 14.8% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 43.4% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 64 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ancient | B | 13 | 7–6 | 54% | 0.03 |
 dust2 | A | 10 | 6–4 | 60% | 0.01 |
 mirage | A | 8 | 5–3 | 63% | 0.06 |
 anubis | S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.06 |
 nuke | D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.04 |
 inferno | C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | 0.03 |
 vertigo | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.03 |
 cache | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.02 |
 overpass | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.04 |
 train | — | 3 | 3–0 | 100% | 0.06 |
| office | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.01 |
| palacio | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.09 |
Across the last 64 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 366 | 55% | 1.21 | 15.9 |
| Anubis | 243 | 53% | 1.29 | 16.4 |
| Dust2 | 215 | 51% | 1.21 | 16.6 |
| Ancient | 191 | 54% | 1.33 | 17.3 |
| Nuke | 163 | 50% | 1.14 | 16.1 |
| Inferno | 88 | 45% | 1.14 | 15.5 |
| Vertigo | 80 | 54% | 1.15 | 16.9 |
| Train | 37 | 68% | 1.51 | 20.1 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.923% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cache | 7–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 4 Aug → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | 0.11 | 17% | 27 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.01 | 17% | 22 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | 0.05 | 29% | 13 May → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.01 | 22% | 12 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.04 | 22% | 7 May → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 4 May → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.06 | 27% | 29 Apr → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | 0.06 | 15% | 29 Apr → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | -0.03 | 36% | 29 Apr → | |
| cache | 13–2 | -0.00 | 22% | 28 Apr → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.06 | 27% | 28 Apr → | |
| ancient | 6–13 | -0.04 | 17% | 22 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | -0.00 | 9% | 16 Apr → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.05 | 8% | 30 Mar → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | 0.03 | 11% | 30 Mar → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | -0.01 | 14% | 30 Mar → | |
| ancient | 3–13 | -0.03 | 25% | 24 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.01 | 20% | 19 Mar → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.17 | 27% | 12 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | 0.00 | 43% | 10 Mar → | |
| overpass | 10–13 | 0.07 | 23% | 10 Mar → | |
| ancient | 13–2 | 0.07 | 14% | 10 Mar → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | 0.11 | 24% | 9 Mar → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 8 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.02 | 38% | 23 Feb → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | 0.08 | 30% | 23 Feb → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.01 | 32% | 10 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–2 | -0.02 | 12% | 7 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.12 | 29% | 7 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 13–6 | 0.07 | 38% | 2 Jan → | |
| train | 10–2 | 0.10 | 17% | 2 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.09 | 14% | 2 Jan → | |
| inferno | 6–9 | 0.00 | 16% | 30 Dec → | |
| ancient | 4–13 | 0.06 | 17% | 26 Dec → | |
| nuke | 15–15 | 0.09 | 17% | 18 Dec → | |
| overpass | 19–17 | -0.00 | 26% | 9 Dec → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.01 | 19% | 5 Dec → | |
| ancient | 16–12 | 0.12 | 23% | 5 Dec → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.01 | 10% | 4 Dec → | |
| office | 13–7 | -0.01 | 29% | 26 Nov → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.20 | 32% | 26 Nov → | |
| overpass | 13–2 | 0.06 | 16% | 19 Nov → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | 0.00 | 18% | 13 Nov → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | -0.02 | 35% | 13 Nov → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.06 | 32% | 12 Nov → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.09 | 23% | 9 Nov → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.03 | 25% | 9 Nov → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.03 | 28% | 9 Nov → | |
| anubis | 13–3 | 0.03 | 13% | 29 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 13–2 | 0.11 | 28% | 22 Oct → | |
| vertigo | 5–13 | -0.05 | 22% | 22 Oct → | |
| anubis | 13–2 | 0.16 | 36% | 19 Oct → | |
| palacio | 13–6 | 0.09 | 23% | 19 Oct → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.08 | 17% | 5 Oct → | |
| inferno | 9–5 | 0.11 | 15% | 30 Sept → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.18 | 36% | 25 Sept → | |
| train | 13–5 | 0.08 | 24% | 17 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | -0.04 | 14% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 13 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.03 | 11% | 11 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.07 | 23% | 6 Aug → | |
| inferno | 3–9 | -0.17 | 10% | 13 Jul → | |
| train | 13–3 | 0.00 | 31% | 25 May → |
Match data via Leetify.