PricklyPickle82 — CS2 Stats

76561198952608003[U:1:992342275]

431Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
455Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,800Purple band · top ~13.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9250 of 18382 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPricklyPickle82FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER18,800 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning45
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50428Last 10050%Win rateLWLLWTTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression5.8
Utility4.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.5
Utility4.4
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time586ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — inferno 9–2
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB30141647%0.02
mirageA22121055%-0.01
dust2B178947%-0.01
nukeB115645%0.05
cacheS64267%-0.01
ancient42250%0.02
debris32167%0.15
poseidon31233%-0.02
anubis31233%-0.02
eldorado110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,308Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
1,578Matches
40.6%Match win rate
50.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
4,536MVPs
455Hours (in match)
893Bombs planted
364Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,893inferno
1,480dust2
1,110nuke
778vertigo
428train
407lake
399cbble
35office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.2%Spray accuracy
90.3%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
552msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.72HE damage / grenade
6.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3343% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0821%10 Aug
cache16–120.0527%10 Aug
nuke7–90.1031%10 Aug
inferno3–9-0.105%10 Aug
inferno9–60.0838%10 Aug
dust215–15-0.0122%10 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0330%10 Aug
mirage16–120.0221%9 Aug
mirage13–70.1017%9 Aug
nuke13–100.0320%9 Aug
cache13–110.0325%9 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0528%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0023%9 Aug
nuke9–40.1527%9 Aug
inferno9–20.3135%9 Aug
debris9–00.1933%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0318%9 Aug
mirage12–120.0334%9 Aug
eldorado9–60.1226%9 Aug
inferno9–20.0429%8 Aug
poseidon8–8-0.0733%8 Aug
inferno5–9-0.1336%8 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1413%8 Aug
inferno5–90.0638%8 Aug
inferno9–60.0729%8 Aug
inferno9–40.038%8 Aug
inferno9–20.2139%7 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0919%7 Aug
poseidon9–40.0917%7 Aug
inferno9–00.0618%7 Aug
nuke9–7-0.0521%7 Aug
nuke9–10.2914%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0416%7 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0211%7 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0525%7 Aug
nuke5–130.0822%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0020%6 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0832%6 Aug
inferno8–80.1434%6 Aug
mirage13–10.0219%6 Aug
dust26–8-0.0426%5 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0345%5 Aug
cache5–13-0.0624%4 Aug
dust213–80.0942%4 Aug
ancient8–30.1629%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0824%4 Aug
dust213–8-0.0227%4 Aug
inferno7–9-0.1330%3 Aug
inferno9–10.2028%3 Aug
inferno12–160.0230%3 Aug
mirage13–60.0430%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0420%3 Aug
debris9–70.0724%3 Aug
inferno9–50.0739%3 Aug
inferno7–130.0123%3 Aug
dust210–13-0.0122%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0619%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0320%3 Aug
mirage13–60.0438%3 Aug
nuke10–130.0227%2 Aug
debris5–90.1924%2 Aug
inferno9–6-0.0220%2 Aug
inferno9–60.0736%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0733%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0650%2 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1128%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0321%2 Aug
nuke6–130.0148%2 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0719%2 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0335%1 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0128%1 Aug
dust213–10-0.0227%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0224%1 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0518%1 Aug
cache13–10-0.0323%31 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0417%31 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0129%31 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0820%31 Jul
dust215–15-0.0411%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0834%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0432%30 Jul
dust213–90.0028%29 Jul
dust216–140.0430%29 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0030%29 Jul
dust29–130.0120%29 Jul
dust213–90.0138%29 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0724%28 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0311%28 Jul
cache13–60.0129%28 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0227%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0251%27 Jul
poseidon4–9-0.0629%27 Jul
mirage2–130.0024%26 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0113%26 Jul
inferno9–60.0115%26 Jul
inferno9–60.1225%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.0614%26 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0414%26 Jul
dust213–60.0132%26 Jul
inferno7–130.0529%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →