vittu työ ootta vammasia — CS2 Stats

76561198920963362[U:1:960697634]

608Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
853Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning27
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50482Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression2.6
Utility5.4
Positioning2.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 49 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 665ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning2.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time667ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 667ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–7
132Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31141745%-0.02
ancientB168850%-0.03
nukeB136746%-0.01
dust2C125742%-0.00
infernoA116555%-0.02
anubisS64267%-0.03
cacheA53260%0.01
overpassS54180%0.00
poseidon1010%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,684Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
1,220Matches
46.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
50.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
12.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
2,787MVPs
481Hours (in match)
1,353Bombs planted
232Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,949inferno
733nuke
665train
597vertigo
463dust2
127cbble
84office
51italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
47%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
62.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%0.9113.0
Ancient333%0.7812.7
Inferno250%1.1815.0
Anubis2100%0.9613.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
665msReaction time
22.6%T opening success
34.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
6.57HE damage / grenade
6.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.6395% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0718%29 Aug
cache13–100.0129%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0124%3 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0029%3 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0925%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0135%25 Jul
cache4–130.0230%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0320%25 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0730%25 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0346%19 Jul
nuke13–40.0537%19 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0438%19 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0811%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0324%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0221%26 Jun
overpass13–3-0.0134%10 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0519%10 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0118%6 Jun
dust213–70.0231%5 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0735%5 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0316%5 Jun
mirage13–40.0814%4 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0112%4 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0117%3 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0125%3 Jun
dust212–16-0.0520%3 Jun
mirage2–130.0633%3 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0419%3 Jun
overpass16–130.0232%29 May
mirage13–10-0.0326%29 May
dust213–11-0.0231%28 May
mirage13–8-0.0613%28 May
dust213–40.0332%28 May
dust29–13-0.0331%25 May
inferno13–90.0118%25 May
nuke16–14-0.0515%25 May
mirage13–50.0216%25 May
inferno16–130.0119%25 May
mirage13–11-0.1019%24 May
nuke13–70.1114%24 May
mirage11–13-0.0226%24 May
mirage12–16-0.0421%22 May
anubis15–15-0.0323%22 May
nuke6–13-0.0431%21 May
nuke13–90.0121%21 May
inferno13–50.0623%21 May
ancient6–13-0.0614%21 May
cache13–40.0613%21 May
cache6–30.0323%21 May
dust213–80.0325%21 May
ancient4–13-0.0529%21 May
mirage10–13-0.0221%20 May
ancient13–100.0122%20 May
cache11–13-0.0630%19 May
mirage6–13-0.1014%19 May
mirage8–13-0.0617%19 May
overpass13–9-0.0317%17 May
inferno16–13-0.0529%17 May
mirage13–8-0.0014%17 May
nuke11–13-0.0614%6 May
overpass16–130.0121%30 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0417%30 Apr
dust212–16-0.0125%25 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0322%23 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0414%23 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0417%23 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0210%16 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0416%1 Apr
dust28–130.0324%1 Apr
overpass8–130.0420%29 Mar
ancient14–160.0316%29 Mar
dust210–13-0.0224%26 Mar
ancient13–40.0323%26 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0226%25 Mar
poseidon6–9-0.1325%25 Mar
inferno8–80.0320%25 Mar
inferno7–9-0.1137%25 Mar
inferno16–140.0532%25 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0217%25 Mar
dust213–7-0.0124%24 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0438%24 Mar
nuke12–160.0019%24 Mar
mirage13–110.0227%24 Mar
dust28–130.0120%24 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0529%24 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0323%23 Mar
ancient13–110.0421%23 Mar
dust24–13-0.0130%22 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0424%22 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0116%21 Mar
mirage11–130.0029%19 Mar
anubis13–90.0116%19 Mar
nuke13–110.0324%17 Mar
mirage8–130.0116%17 Mar
mirage13–8-0.077%17 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0921%17 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0217%17 Mar
mirage9–130.0020%17 Mar
inferno10–13-0.1120%15 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0112%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →