Nip9xx — CS2 Stats

76561198906455283[U:1:946189555]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

783Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,189Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,977 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	51.8%	49.0%	52.0%	meets
Shot accuracy	12.9%	13.1%	13.7%	0.8% short
Kill/death ratio	1.19	1.08	1.08	above
Match win rate	47.5%	46.9%	48.8%	1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning48

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–48–6Last 10046%Win rateWWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3

Aggression4.9

Utility6.8

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning4.8

Utility6.8

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time615ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms

Headshot accuracy18.0%−10.5%

first ⅓ avg 28.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	41	22–19	54%	0.01
inferno	C	19	8–11	42%	0.02
nuke	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.00
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
dust2	—	3	0–3	0%	0.05
train	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	0.00
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,358Lifetime kills

1.19K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players

1,611Matches

47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players

51.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players

12.9%Shot accuracy

4,036MVPs

722Hours (in match)

2,380Bombs planted

432Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,376

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,890

Desert Eagle2,949

P2000 / USP-S2,931

AWP1,715

Glock-181,328

AUG840

Galil AR697

MP9662

SG 553599

Lifetime map wins

2,734inferno

1,279vertigo

1,272nuke

408train

361dust2

64lake

52office

27stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

403Matches

54%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

79.5ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	96	55%	1.23	16.2
Ancient	62	55%	1.14	16.0
Nuke	42	52%	1.11	17.0
Inferno	38	55%	1.16	16.4
Train	13	62%	0.94	12.6
Anubis	7	57%	1.02	17.4
Dust2	5	60%	1.34	16.6
Vertigo	4	75%	1.36	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy

36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.7%Spray accuracy

85.0%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

614msReaction time

26.7%T opening success

41.1%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

9.0%Flash assists

10.19HE damage / grenade

16.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.7115% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	0.02	28%	28 Aug →
ancient	22–20	-0.03	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	20%	27 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	11%	25 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	15%	21 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.03	17%	21 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	8%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	21%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	18%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	38%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	19%	7 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	15%	5 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	21%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.10	12%	4 Jul →
inferno	20–22	0.04	15%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	22%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–3	-0.06	9%	15 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.01	18%	18 May →
mirage	13–6	0.06	12%	19 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.08	18%	7 Mar →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	17%	7 Mar →
anubis	13–4	0.05	12%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.00	42%	7 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.03	24%	13 Feb →
anubis	6–13	0.01	31%	19 Jan →
anubis	7–13	0.04	22%	19 Jan →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	18%	16 Jan →
nuke	7–13	0.04	17%	19 Dec →
nuke	11–13	0.06	18%	18 Dec →
nuke	1–4	-0.04	0%	18 Dec →
inferno	13–6	0.03	14%	18 Dec →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	12%	16 Dec →
train	4–13	-0.05	17%	10 Dec →
nuke	13–4	0.03	24%	8 Dec →
ancient	13–9	0.05	10%	8 Dec →
office	12–12	-0.01	24%	26 Nov →
inferno	6–13	0.03	39%	26 Nov →
mirage	16–13	0.02	15%	25 Nov →
train	9–13	0.02	25%	25 Nov →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	25%	25 Nov →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	17%	25 Nov →
overpass	10–13	-0.03	17%	25 Nov →
mirage	13–9	0.05	13%	9 Nov →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	14%	7 Nov →
inferno	8–13	0.04	14%	3 Nov →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	15%	30 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.09	25%	30 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.14	31%	30 Oct →
inferno	13–2	0.01	14%	29 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.00	11%	26 Oct →
ancient	14–16	-0.05	14%	26 Oct →
mirage	9–12	-0.01	19%	23 Oct →
dust2	15–15	0.00	18%	17 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.07	14%	15 Oct →
inferno	5–13	0.03	18%	15 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.02	13%	14 Oct →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	10%	14 Oct →
mirage	16–13	0.08	19%	14 Oct →
mirage	15–15	0.03	14%	14 Oct →
overpass	7–13	0.04	9%	14 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	32%	10 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	38%	10 Oct →
nuke	16–13	0.00	18%	11 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.10	19%	11 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.02	24%	11 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.02	18%	11 Sept →
ancient	16–13	0.04	16%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	30%	5 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.06	22%	5 Jul →
train	16–14	-0.01	17%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.07	13%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.04	28%	12 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.06	18%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.09	18%	11 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.03	17%	11 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	21%	11 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.02	100%	5 Nov →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	18%	4 Nov →
mirage	8–13	0.04	15%	20 Oct →
mirage	16–12	0.02	17%	20 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	36%	19 Oct →
mirage	12–12	0.11	26%	19 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.00	20%	1 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	40%	1 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	17%	1 Oct →
mirage	1–4	-0.16	67%	30 Sept →
mirage	1–13	-0.09	0%	30 Sept →
mirage	13–0	0.01	100%	30 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.06	18%	29 Sept →
nuke	1–13	-0.05	26%	18 Sept →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	25%	18 Sept →
inferno	15–15	0.03	24%	17 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	9%	17 Sept →
mirage	0–4	0.01	13%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	50%	16 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.01	14%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.08	21%	14 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.13	28%	12 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.03	26%	12 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.01	45%	12 Sept →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price