artzella — CS2 Stats

76561198890271601[U:1:930005873]

430Tracked matches46%Win rate2022Tracked since
202Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,183Purple band · top ~19.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13366 of 23884 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate47.0%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy11.9%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.190.990.99above
Match win rate43.5%43.9%44.2%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGartzellaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER17,183 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning66
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY533710Last 10053%Win rateWTLLWWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression8.0
Utility4.6
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact3.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time609ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 77% over 13anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2013765%0.07
dust2C1971237%0.02
infernoB179853%0.05
vertigoB158753%0.07
nukeS1310377%0.05
anubisD61517%0.01
office32167%0.08
train32167%0.01
overpass110100%0.15
ancient1010%0.05
cache1010%0.05
poseidon1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,592Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
627Matches
43.5%Match win rate
47.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
11.9%Shot accuracy
1,671MVPs
202Hours (in match)
734Bombs planted
160Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,299dust2
1,053inferno
763nuke
295vertigo
81office
56train
9italy
4militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
13.0°Preaim
611msReaction time
45.0%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.43HE damage / grenade
6.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.9607° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0711%8 Aug
dust212–12-0.0019%7 Aug
mirage7–130.0226%7 Aug
vertigo11–130.0419%26 Jun
mirage13–100.0622%10 Jun
inferno9–40.0813%9 Jun
vertigo13–40.069%9 Jun
vertigo7–130.0118%4 Jun
vertigo9–20.1932%28 May
anubis12–120.0018%27 May
anubis13–9-0.0015%27 May
inferno9–130.1116%22 May
mirage12–160.0821%21 May
inferno13–70.0618%21 May
dust20–13-0.076%20 May
dust212–120.0320%17 May
inferno4–13-0.0330%16 May
dust210–130.0626%16 May
vertigo9–130.0318%16 May
dust213–70.0218%14 May
mirage14–16-0.0312%13 May
office13–110.0230%13 May
overpass13–30.1527%10 May
mirage13–60.1919%10 May
ancient9–130.0522%10 May
inferno13–30.1818%10 May
mirage13–70.0817%10 May
dust23–13-0.0722%10 May
inferno12–120.0118%7 May
mirage4–130.0616%7 May
dust26–13-0.0024%7 May
nuke13–40.0416%7 May
mirage13–110.0723%7 May
anubis11–130.0725%7 May
vertigo13–100.0428%6 May
dust23–13-0.0927%6 May
mirage0–13-0.0333%6 May
nuke13–70.0225%6 May
cache4–130.0518%6 May
mirage13–10.109%5 May
dust213–70.0634%5 May
inferno13–110.0021%4 May
mirage9–20.0718%4 May
inferno13–90.1024%1 May
inferno8–130.0132%30 Apr
dust213–30.0619%30 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0427%29 Apr
vertigo13–30.0919%29 Apr
poseidon8–80.0614%29 Apr
nuke6–130.0221%29 Apr
train9–13-0.0317%29 Apr
vertigo13–50.0918%29 Apr
nuke5–130.0423%28 Apr
nuke13–90.0821%28 Apr
mirage12–120.0318%28 Apr
dust23–13-0.0822%28 Apr
mirage13–40.1318%28 Apr
nuke13–40.0723%27 Apr
nuke13–110.0311%27 Apr
nuke13–80.1012%27 Apr
dust28–130.0516%27 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0310%27 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0419%27 Apr
dust29–130.0322%27 Apr
inferno11–50.1723%27 Apr
vertigo13–20.1513%27 Apr
mirage13–80.0827%27 Apr
mirage13–70.1814%27 Apr
dust213–100.0720%27 Apr
mirage13–30.1017%26 Apr
dust25–130.1221%26 Apr
inferno12–120.0116%25 Apr
dust213–70.1024%24 Apr
inferno10–130.0313%24 Apr
dust213–40.2018%24 Apr
dust210–13-0.0218%23 Apr
vertigo13–50.0914%23 Apr
train13–20.0126%22 Apr
train13–110.0418%22 Apr
nuke9–70.0920%21 Apr
nuke13–90.0020%21 Apr
inferno13–50.0318%18 Apr
mirage2–2-0.0015%17 Apr
dust213–50.0015%16 Apr
inferno8–80.0123%12 Apr
inferno8–80.0624%12 Apr
nuke13–100.0722%9 Apr
vertigo4–13-0.0210%8 Apr
vertigo2–130.0620%8 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0225%8 Apr
vertigo6–130.1423%8 Apr
anubis12–120.0418%2 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0127%2 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0435%1 Apr
mirage13–30.1234%25 Mar
nuke7–70.0619%19 Mar
office13–40.1750%19 Mar
office11–130.0329%18 Mar
inferno13–90.0534%13 Mar
vertigo13–110.1238%12 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →